2012-08-07_PR_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

orders, or dissatisfaction from the Owner. Do not include in this submittal any risks caused by a lack of the Respondent's technical competency. The risks should be described in simple terms so that non-technical personnel can understand the heh The Respondent must also explain how they will rnitigate, rnanage, and/or minimize the risk from occurring. A mitigation and management plan with supporting documented performance references is required for a high rating from the selection committee. This performance information may include where the mitigation plan was used previoue|y, and the impact on performance in terms of customer satisfaction and the number of times it was used and successful. Evaluation w The Evaluation Committee will review and rate each Risk Plan document. To references.receive a high rating, the Respondent must support / document their capability to mitigate, manage, and minimize the risk with either verifiable performance metrics or best value practices with performance measurements A submittal that does not support a claim of risk mitigation with performance measurements (previous job customer satisfaction meaeuremente, scope of the measured projects, on time and on budget peroentagee, deviation rates or a combination of performance measurements that support the claim) may not help the Respondent to gain a high rating. 3.5 PROJECT CAPABILITY PLAN w The Respondent must submit Attachment F. The Project Capability Plan is to allow the Respondent to differentiate their capability to meet the requirements of this project with a plan that meets time and cost goals. The Respondent must also identify their "vision" or ^p|an^ on the alignment of their expertise over the duration of the project, minimizing risk by tracking time and cost deviation of the project as a capability. The Respondent should also address cash flow and disbursements on the project, and how it is integrated into the schedule. All activities associated with capabilities listed in the Plan must be included in the Respondent's base cost and schedule. Evaluation w The Evaluation Committee will review and rate each Project Capability Plan. The evaluators will not be provided with names or any other information prior to evaluating the Plan (to minimize any personal bias). To receive a high rating, the references.Respondent must use either verifiable performance metrics or best value practices with performance measurements The perfO[Dl8DCe iDfO[Dl8tiOD is the documentation that supports the Respondent's o|airne and which will lead to a high rating. 3.6 VALUE ADDED PLAN w The Respondent must submit Attachment G. The Value Added Plan provides Respondents with an opportunity to identify any value added options or ideas that may benefit the Owner. These options or ideas may also be referred to as additional or optional services. Where applicable, the Respondent should identify: 1) what the client may have excluded or omitted from its scope; and 2) how these options or ideas have been successful through verifiable performance information and/or best value practices. The Respondent should identify and briefly describe any optione, ideae, a|ternativee, or suggestions to add value to this project, and indicate how the Page 22o[4O