Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting AND <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals <br /> Monday,July 23,2012 <br /> Page 2 <br /> to include that information wherever pertinent. Ms. White opined that this pro- <br /> vided notice to citizens to get off the City database if they chose to do so, at <br /> which time the City's database could have been purged, and only those interest- <br /> ed in remaining on the list(s) could have signed back on. Ms. White further <br /> suggested that providers have an option of citizens being able to opt out of hav- <br /> ing their e-mail addresses shared elsewhere. Ms. White noted that signing up <br /> for e-mail notifications at the City provided police alerts and other information <br /> of use to citizens. <br /> Ms. White advised that, in communication with staff earlier today, she had un- <br /> subscribed all electronic notifications from the City; however, she expressed <br /> concern that e-mails already provided to the City Council or staff may still be in <br /> the database and provided to other parties, with no way to remedy that distribu- <br /> tion. Ms. White noted her serious concern that her electronic payment via credit <br /> card of her utility bill may now be available for e-mail; and questioned how <br /> much access these third parties would have to that information: whether her <br /> credit card and/or account information, or simply water usage information. For <br /> electronic payment of utility bills, Ms. White noted that you could not sign off <br /> without an e-mail address filled in. Ms. White asked that staff attempt to cor- <br /> rect this situation immediately; stating that she did not want her e-mail address <br /> distributed by the City without her prior approval; and asked for assurances <br /> from staff that her e-mail, credit card, and account information was no longer in <br /> the City's database, especially assurances that her phone number, bank and <br /> credit card information were not in the e-mail records staff provided to the third <br /> party at their request. <br /> Ms. White opined that it made it difficult to be an informed citizen when per- <br /> sonal information is readily available to anyone making a request for that data <br /> from outside the City system. <br /> Dick Lambert, 800 Brenner Avenue <br /> Mr. Lambert echoed Ms. White's comments. Mr. Lambert noted that, from his <br /> research, he had determined that the City had this information request for three <br /> (3) weeks, but staff didn't inform the public of the request until a Friday after- <br /> noon, after the information had been provided. Mr. Lambert suggested that as <br /> block captain for his block, police alerts and other vital information for him to <br /> share with the neighbors, would not be as readily available for him to share, <br /> since he now found it necessary to un-subscribe from the City's e-mail lists. <br /> Mr. Lambert suggested that the City launch an investigation from this individual <br /> requesting his e-mail and other personal information to ensure that no laws had <br /> been broken; and expressed his frustration that the information had been provid- <br /> ed prior to citizens being made aware of the distribution that would have al- <br /> lowed them to be proactive in removing their e-mail information. <br />