CC_Minutes_2012_0723 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting AND Board of Adjustments and Appeals Monday,July 23,2012 Page 22 McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, approval of the request by Kyoto Sushi for an On-Sale and Sunday Liquor License at 2100 N Snelling Avenue, Suite 80 Roll Call Ayes: McGehee; Pust; Johnson; Willmus; and Roe. Nays: None. b. Approve Brown-Wilbert Minor Subdivision Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd summarized this request by Brown-Wilbert, Inc. for approval of a RECOMBINATION MINOR SUBDIVISION at 2280 Ham- line Avenue and 2253 Dellwood Street, as detailed in the RCA dated July 23, 2012. Mr. Lloyd reviewed highlights of staff's analysis, and review by the De- velopment Review Committee (DRC), addressing conditions applied. Mr. Lloyd noted existing long-term storm water management issues in this area, outside the realm of this request or this property, and outlined in Section 5.00 of the report. Parts of those issues were proposed for some resolution through ded- ication of additional easements from the applicant to meet the existing storm sewer easements, as conditioned. Mr. Lloyd reviewed several maps of the property, noting the complexities of the configuration, in addition to zoning of the properties from Office/Business Park to Low-Density Residential-1. Mr. Lloyd opined that this was probably desig- nated as such according to and because of the direct relationship to the Roseville branch of the Ramsey County Library further south, and its recent expansion. Mr. Lloyd advised that Brown-Wilbert owned the residential property, and zon- ing was still guided in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning, even with this request, assuring that they can't expand into those areas without addressing those underlying documents and designations, ultimately locking in the current function of the property. Councilmember Willmus stated that he didn't have any over-reaching concerns, other than potential changes over time to this home site at 2253 Dellwood; and questioned if the applicant had any problem with an additional condition ad- dressing ingress/egress across that parcel, and that it remain only for residential uses. Councilmember Willmus expressed his curiosity in the applicant's future intent for that parcel, if not for a single-family home. Mr. Lloyd advised that he was not aware of any plans of the applicant, but staff would have no problem with the additional condition. Discussion ensued on whether that would be an appropriate condition for this type of subdivision application; status of and location of the existing garage on the residential parcel based on survey information prepared to-date, with the