2007_0723_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Study Session Monday, July 16, 2007 Page 18 i 2 Mr. Paschke noted that Public Hearings had been heard at the Plan- 3 ning Commission level, and advised that standard practice didn't dic- 4 tate that process. 5 6 7 . � Mr. Lindgren advised that the applicant had requested an extension of the 60-day rule to allow for additional engineering and fox more pub- lic input that had in turn prompted their completion of the voluntary EAW. 11 Councilmember Ihlan repeatedly expressed her frustration with being 12 unable to review the completeness of the EAW and receive public in- 13 put prior to the August meetzng. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mayor Klausing clarified, and Mr. Paschke confirmed, that the Plan- ning Commission considered the amendment based on the Master Plan that the College would like to have supported, from a student population, addition of additional structure(s), and proposed site im- provements, and that that the PUD Agreement was premised on that process and mitigations of the impacts created by that amended PUD. Mr. Paschke confirmed that the PUD Agreement would condition what could and could not be done based on their submitted materials and plans, and would serve as a contracival obligation between the College and City. Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her preference for review of the agreement pxior to approval of the Amended PUD. 29 Discussion included clarification that the PUD Agreement was only 30 related to the campus proper, not extenuating properties owned by the 3I college; perceived sufficiency of the EAW; definition of fuil-time 32 equxvalent student calculations and enrollment proj ections; and traffic 33 impacts. 34 35 The applicant agreed to provide detailed enrollment breakdowns for 36 the ne� meeting as requested by Councilmemb�r Ihlan (on and off- 37 site enxollment; and fu11- and/or part-time enrollment). 38