2012_1119_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10 142 12 595 13 691 14 246 15 82 16 422 17a 89 17b 84 18 169 162 163 164 If development on a Block will not generate Network Trips in excess of the number 165 allocated to the Block in this Section E, the pr operty owner(s) of such Parcel shall not be 166 obligated to pay the Twin Lakes Roadway Improvement Cost Allocation Amount set 167 forth in the TLIIR for such development. 168 169 F. Appeal of Network Trips: In the event that the property owner(s) of a Block do not agree 170 with the determination of the Network Trips a llocated to their Block pursuant to Section 171 E above, the property owner(s) of such Bloc k may appeal the determination to the 172 Roseville City Council. No appeal may be taken with respect to the Network Trips 173 allocated in Section E above unless the aff ected property owner(s) file a written appeal 174 with the City Manager within one hundred eigh ty (180) days after the adoption of this 175 ordinance. The failure to file a timely appeal eliminates all right to challenge a Network 176 Trip allocation designated in Section E a bove. The appeal must be accompanied by a 177 report prepared by a registered traffic e ngineer which provides evidence indicating 178 potential errors in the determination of the Network Trips and the reasons why the 179 determination of Network Trips is not accurate. When an appeal is filed the matter shall 180 be heard and considered by the Roseville City Council at a p ublic meeting. The property 181 owner(s) making the appeal shall be given th e opportunity at the meeting to testify and 182 present evidence with respect to the Network Trips allocated to their Block. Notice of the 183 meeting shall be mailed to the appealing prop erty owner(s) at the address where the tax 184 statement for the Block which is subject to the appeal is mailed according to the records 185 of the Ramsey County Property Tax Depart ment. Following making its decision, the 186 City Council shall serve a copy of its decisi on upon the property ow ner(s) of the Block 187 which was the subject of the appeal by mail at the address where tax statements for such 188 Block is mailed. No judicial action shal l be taken regarding the determination of 189 Network Trips allocated to a Block pursuan t to Section E above unless and until the 190 foregoing appeal is made to the City C ouncil and the City Council has rendered and 191 served its decision on the matter. 192 193 G. Other Improvements: Nothing in the Sectio n may be construed to eliminate property 194 owner(s) responsibility for other improvements unrelated to the Roadway Infrastructure 195 Improvements. If a traffic study finds that road system improvements unrelated to the 196 Roadway Infrastructure Improvements are required as a result of the proposed 197 development, the development may not be commenced until arrangements, including 198