Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 4 <br />81 <br />82 For reference, with implementation of these recommendations, the current City property tax for <br />83 the median residential property in Roseville would increase from approximately $588 to $608, or <br />84 by $20 per year. (This estimate is based on a taxable value decrease of 3.7% (from $214,200 to <br />85 $206,300), a tax capacity decrease of 3.7 %, and the proposed 3.4% levy increase for capital <br />86 funding purposes.) <br />87 <br />88 <br />89 Utility (Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer) Needs. (The subcommittee is still working <br />90 on a recommendation with respect to the Utility Funds, which is expected to be made at the June <br />91 20, 2011, council meeting.) <br />92 <br />93 <br />94 Fire Station. The subcommittee did not make a specific recommendation as to funding a new <br />95 fire station, which has no currently programmed funding source. That is because the planning <br />96 for a new station is an ongoing process, and the likely primary funding source is borrowing <br />97 (bonding). The subcommittee notes for reference that the annual cost to repay a bond issue of <br />98 approximately $7 million over 15 years (assuming that bond amount and term, and assuming a <br />99 4% rate) is about $580,000 per year of additional tax levy and/or program reductions. <br />100 <br />101 As an aside, the subcommittee notes that the Equipment and Facilities capital needs identified in <br />102 this report do not include capital funding for maintaining the use of any of the existing fire <br />103 stations. (In other words, there is not any "double- counting" in the area of fire station capital <br />104 funding.) <br />105 <br />106 <br />107 Parks & Pathways Capital Needs. Another very significant area of under- funding is the area of <br />108 Parks and Pathways. This has been the case for the last several years at least, and is projected to <br />109 be so into the future, especially as the new Parks & Recreation System Master Plan <br />110 implementation is begun. As stated earlier, because the review of the implementation of the <br />111 Master Plan is currently underway, the subcommittee did not make any specific <br />112 recommendations related to funding of Park and Pathway capital needs. (The subcommittee has <br />113 included pathway funding with park capital funding, citing the links between those areas that <br />114 were noted in the Master Plan.) <br />115 <br />116 Until the Master Plan implementation process is complete, at a minimum the subcommittee <br />117 recommends maintaining the Parks Improvement Program (PIP) funding at its current tax - <br />118 supported level of $185,000 per year. <br />119 <br />120 Additionally, the subcommittee recommends that the Master Plan implementation process take <br />121 into account the timing of the retirement (pay -off) of current City bond debt for the City Hall and <br />122 Public Works Building project, which is scheduled to occur in 2018. The retirement of that debt <br />123 will reduce the annual levy requirement for debt service by approximately $900,000 per year <br />124 from that time forward, potentially providing that amount of levy capacity for new borrowing at <br />125 that time for park needs. <br />126 <br />