My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2012 11:52:23 AM
Creation date
11/28/2012 11:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 22,2012 <br /> Page 14 <br /> tutional investor perspective; with all of those considerations laid out prior to <br /> the actual investment. <br /> Councilmember Johnson, recognizing the complexity of the investment strate- <br /> gy, stated that he would prefer personally to see investments stay within the <br /> United States. However, Councilmember Johnson also recognized the practical- <br /> ities, and staff's recommendation; and while his personal philosophy may differ, <br /> Councilmember Johnson deferred to the expertise and judgment of Mr. Miller <br /> for the best interest for the City's investment. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that he shared that same sentiment as expressed by Coun- <br /> cilmember Johnson; however, he recognized the dynamic changes in the global <br /> economy over the last 4-5 years, and again stressed the temporary nature of this <br /> requested action. Mr. Miller stated that he hoped to see credit agency adjust- <br /> ments and increased agency ratings again in the near future. <br /> Johnson moved, McGehee seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11021, enti- <br /> tled, "Resolution Adopting Financial and Budget Policies for the City of Rose- <br /> ville;" approving the revised Investment Policy as detailed in the RCA dated <br /> October 22, 2012. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Miller clarified that this action <br /> would direct staff to proceed, and they would not be returning to the City Coun- <br /> cil for subsequent action for approval,based on the need for a fluid and dynamic <br /> bid process. Mr. Miller assured Councilmembers that staff would stay within <br /> the approved outlined framework. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that, based on his previous comments, he <br /> would be voting in opposition to the motion; and while concurring with Coun- <br /> cilmember Johnson's comments regarding deferring to staff's expertise, from <br /> his personal perspective, the risk outweighed any gain, if projected at less than <br /> '/a%. <br /> Councilmember Pust clarified that, while this proposed temporary change al- <br /> lowed staff to go outside the United States, it also didn't preclude them from <br /> staying within the United States. <br /> Mr. Miller concurred, however, he anticipated that the best bids would come <br /> from outside the United States, as that market continued to provide the best <br /> rates at this time. <br /> Councilmember Pust advised that she shared similar concerns to those raised by <br /> Councilmembers Willmus and Johnson; however, she also recognized the need <br /> to make the best use of the public's money in this current financial market. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.