Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment F <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 22"d day of October 2012 at 6:00 <br />p.m. <br />The following Members were present: ; <br />and were absent. <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY AS A <br />CONDITIONAL USE AT 2700 LINCOLN DRIVE (PF12-018) <br />WHEREAS, Semper Development has applied for approval of the proposed conditional <br />use in conjunction with HarMar, Inc., owner of the property at 2700 Lincoln Drive, which is <br />� � legally described as: <br />PIN: 04-29-23-44-0030 <br />Slawik Park Addition No. 4, subject to easement, Lot 1 through Lot 4, Block 1 <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />proposed coNDITioNAL usE on October 3, 2012, voting 6-0 to recommend approval of the use <br />based on the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said public hearing; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed <br />�� coN��T1oNAL uSE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the <br />� following findings: <br />a. While a drive-through facility doesn't appreciably advance the goals of the <br />Comprehensive Plan aside from facilitating continued investment in a property, it <br />does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan; <br />b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan <br />, because no such plans apply to the area surrounding the property; <br />�� c. The proposed use is not in conflict with City Code requirements since permits <br />will not be issued if the plans fail to meet all of the relevant requirements and, <br />moreover, the conditional use approval can be rescinded if the use or the property <br />< fails at any time to comply with all applicable Code requirements or conditions of <br />. the approval; <br />d. The property has been a restaurant for many years, which generates significantly <br />. more traffic than the proposed drive-through pharmacy window—especially <br />during evening hours and weekends, so the proposal is not expected to intensify <br />any practical impacts on parks, streets, or public infrastructure; <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />