My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0520_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0520_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2013 2:45:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2013 11:15:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d.City Code §1103.06 (Lot Standards): <br /> Interior lots must be at least 85 feet wide, 110 <br />55 <br />feet deep and comprise at least 11,000 square feet in area. The proposed lots these <br />56 <br />requirements, being 90 feet in width, and ranging from about 140 feet to 190 feet in depth <br />57 <br />and about 13,000 square feet to more than 16,000 square feet in area. The narrow parcels <br />58 <br />immediately adjacent to Millwood Avenue on either side of the proposed internal street <br />59 <br />will house the storm water infiltration basins needed to meet drainage requirements and <br />60 <br />will be owned and maintained by the City according to Roseville’s standard practice. <br />61 <br />e.City Code §1103.04 (Easements): <br /> Drainage and utility easements 12 feet in width <br />62 <br />are required along rear property lines and centered on side property lines. The easements <br />63 <br />shown on the preliminary plat drawing meet these requirements. <br />64 <br />5.3Roseville’s Public Works Department staff have been working with the applicant to <br />65 <br />address the construction requirements related to grading and drainage, public street <br />66 <br />design, and the public utilities that will be required within the new right-of-way. While <br />67 <br />these details are essential parts of a application, the City Council is <br />68 PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />not asked to review and digest such engineering-related plans; instead, actions by the <br />69 <br />Planning Commission and the City Council typically include conditions that such plans <br />70 <br />must ultimately meet the City’s Public Works design standards. <br />71 <br />5.4Studies show that households in one-family, detached homes, as proposed, can generate <br />72 <br />up to 11 vehicle trips per day; multiplied across the proposed 6 lots, the residential <br />73 <br />subdivision could be expected to contribute up to 66 additional vehicle trips per day on <br />74 <br />Millwood Avenue. Looking a little more broadly, there are about 150 such one-family <br />75 <br />homes in the neighborhood to the south of County Road D, west of Victoria Street, and <br />76 <br />north of Millwood Avenue that generate traffic in this neighborhood. Using the same <br />77 <br />assumption of 11 daily trips per household, this neighborhood could generate <br />78 <br />approximately 1,650 trips per day. Millwood Avenue serves as a local collector road for <br />79 <br />this neighborhood. A traffic count on Millwood Avenue indicates that the weekday <br />80 <br />volume on this road is 350 trips; since a 2-lane road has the capacity to handle up to <br />81 <br />10,000 vehicle trips per day, Millwood Avenue and the surrounding streets have adequate <br />82 <br />capacity for the 6 proposed homes. <br />83 <br />5.5City Code §1011.04 (Tree Preservation) specifies that a, approved tree preservation plan <br />84 <br />is a necessary prerequisite for approval of a . A tree survey has been <br />85 PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />provided which identifies the trees on the property as well as the trees which are likely to <br />86 <br />be removed, based on the current grading plan and generalized locations houses and <br />87 <br />driveways. While the essential information has been provided, the final tree preservation <br />88 <br />plan depends upon the final grading plan, which may not be finalized until the final plat; <br />89 <br />for this reason, it is prudent to proceed with review and possible approval of the <br />90 <br /> with the condition that a final tree preservation be approved <br />91 PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />concurrent with the final plat. <br />92 <br />5.6Roseville’s Building Official has observed that the proposed new street generally aligns <br />93 <br />with other segments of Milton Street and has recommended a name like Milton Court, <br />94 <br />Milton Circle, or the like, for the proposed street in order to be consistent with the <br />95 <br />broader street network. <br />96 <br />5.7At its meeting of April 2, 2013 Roseville’s Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed <br />97 <br />the proposed against the park dedication requirements of §1103.07 of <br />98 PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />the City Code and recommended a dedication of cash in lieu of land. The existing, <br />99 <br />undeveloped parcel is composed of buildable portions of two lots created in the 1857 <br />100 <br />PF13-005_RCA_052013 (2).doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.