My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 10:13:33 AM
Creation date
6/5/2013 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 20, 2013 <br /> Page 26 <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> By consensus, Councilmembers decided that no break was needed at this point, <br /> and they would remain at the dais rather than moving to the work table. <br /> c. Community Development Department Request to Perform an Abatement for <br /> Unresolved Violation of City Code at 949 Brooks <br /> Removed from tonight's agenda as previously noted. <br /> 14. Business Items—Presentations/Discussions <br /> a. Discuss Limited Processing and Production in the Regional Business District <br /> Removed from tonight's agenda as previously noted. <br /> b. Discuss Multi-Family Rental Housing Licensing <br /> Two bench handouts were provided for this discussion consisting of a City map <br /> identifying multiple dwelling units city-wide (Attachment C) and a comparison <br /> listing of other metropolitan cities with licensing and rental registration programs <br /> (Attachment D), <br /> HRA Housing Program Manager Jeanne Kelsey summarized the most current it- <br /> eration outlining a multi-family rental housing licensing program for the City of <br /> Roseville, as previously discussed at a joint meeting of the City Council and HRA <br /> in May of this year. <br /> With continual vetting by property owners through their membership in the Min- <br /> nesota Multi-Family Housing Association, Ms. Kelsey advised that their general <br /> concern was the initial cost for third party inspection of 100% of their units. <br /> While it was a given that this initial cost would be burdensome, Ms. Kelsey, noted <br /> that its goal was to provide a base for future compliance and inspections; and ad- <br /> vised that the HRA and staff continued to look at possible alternatives, with none <br /> being endorsed by the HRA at this time. Ms. Kelsey advised that the concern that <br /> there were few options to make it fair and equitable for all property owners unless <br /> inspections of 100% of the units was initially done. Ms. Kelsey advised that the <br /> estimated cost for all properties, if the City wished to absorb that cost, would be <br /> $138,250 for third-party inspections. <br /> Lisa Peilen, Director of Municipal Affairs with the Minnesota Multi-Family <br /> Housing Association <br /> Ms. Peilen reiterated her past appreciation for the HRA's outreach to their associ- <br /> ation and property owners/members throughout this process. Ms. Peilen noted <br /> that this ordinance was modeled after that of the City of Brooklyn Center. Ms. <br /> Peilen advised that their membership supported the tiered system, rewarding good <br /> properties and providing incentive to improve properties, with resources then fo- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.