My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 10:13:33 AM
Creation date
6/5/2013 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 20, 2013 <br /> Page 28 <br /> the units and now hiring new staff, with a break-even cost comparison at this <br /> point. <br /> Councilmember Willmus thanked Ms. Kelsey for including City Council meeting <br /> minutes from the last discussion with the HRA, and asked that the HRA meeting <br /> minutes also be provided to the City Council for benefit of their discussion as <br /> well. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember/HRA Member Willmus summa- <br /> rized those discussions, and property owners expressing concern with the fees as <br /> addressed by Ms. Peilen and Ms. Kelsey. Councilmember Willmus noted that he <br /> raised the option to continue exploring different types of licenses and fee struc- <br /> tures based on that license type, seeking further exploration. <br /> If the initial fee was handled upfront by the HRA, Councilmember McGehee <br /> questioned if there was a way to distribute that cost to property owners as part of <br /> the fee or through another option over time in order to recoup that initial cost by <br /> the HRA. Councilmember McGehee opined that it seemed to be important to ob- <br /> tain that initial inspection to set the base line; and spoke in support of the rest of <br /> the recommendations. However, as a rental property owner herself, Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee shared the concerns of the initial impact of this program, <br /> and questioned if some type of accommodation, similar to that for unpaid utility <br /> bills and/or abatements, could be used for the City to absorb those upfront costs <br /> for the property owner. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted his suggestion to the HRA for a fee structure <br /> based on classification of properties from Type A through Type D. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned how that classification could be achieved without the ini- <br /> tial inspection. Mayor Roe referenced Councilmember McGehee's comment <br /> about certifying unpaid inspection fees on property taxes; however, he encour- <br /> aged considering options for the City to be more proactive. One option presented <br /> by Mayor Roe included implementing it over a three year phase in where only a <br /> third of the units were inspected annually, and by the end of the three year period, <br /> they would all be classified, like a probationary classification until that inspection <br /> schedule was completed in its entirety. <br /> Ms. Kelsey responded by noting that if the City did annual licensing, the fees for <br /> property owners would be equitable, but if only inspected every three years, their <br /> status would remain an unknown until after that three year period was achieved. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested further consideration of a way to accomplish that. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Trudgeon clarified that the <br /> HRA's Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) only provide for external in- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.