Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 20,2013 <br /> Page 29 <br /> spections, not internal inspections; and advised that the same staff performing that <br /> program would not be qualified to perform internal inspections. <br /> Ms. Peilen expressed appreciation that the City Council was willing to explore the <br /> issue, and reiterated the willingness of their membership in continuing to work <br /> with the City to negate this huge upfront cost for property owners. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if it made sense for a three year process, and after the first <br /> round of inspections, determine a probationary rate and mitigate costs as well,un- <br /> less such an effort would provide too much complexity. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon observed that this had provided for good discussion, and was simi- <br /> lar to that held at the HRA level, and recognized that the initial inspections were <br /> critical to establish a base, while also being cognizant of their expense. While it <br /> appeared that the City Council was asking for alternatives or solutions for fund- <br /> ing, Mr. Trudgeon noted that it could be argued that as a City the goal was to <br /> make sure it had the best quality housing, and could accomplish that by infusing <br /> dollars from the HRA and/or City. However, recognizing that funding was lim- <br /> ited, Mr. Trudgeon noted that this may not be viable, but he was hearing that the <br /> desire was to keep exploring options, and would prove helpful direction to staff <br /> and the HRA moving forward, in attempting to find a solution other than 100% <br /> and continue working with the association. Mr. Trudgeon noted that he was not <br /> hearing that this was not a good basis from which to start, just that a funding <br /> mechanism was critical to make the whole thing work. Absent the financing as- <br /> pect, Mr. Trudgeon suggested that the process could continue to move while those <br /> considerations were fine-tuned; advising that the program was anticipated for im- <br /> plementation in 2015, not 2014, to facilitate getting things in order from an ad- <br /> ministrative and budget perspective, and working out schedules with property <br /> owner s for initial inspections. <br /> Ms. Kelsey noted that property owners had also asked that the schedule recognize <br /> their budget cycles, advising that if drafting of an ordinance was initiated, proper- <br /> ty owners would still be included in the process, with anticipated adoption before <br /> year-end 2013, allowing an entire year (2014) to put the framework together, and <br /> allow property owners to work this cost into their budgets and allow the City time <br /> to find third-party inspectors and seek authorization for inspections. At the last <br /> HRA meeting, Ms. Kelsey advised that staff was authorized to move forward with <br /> drafting an ordinance and working out the details, while continue seeking addi- <br /> tional comment from all parties, including property owners. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned what type of program could be put in place <br /> for self-reporting or tenant reporting directly to the City with assurances there <br /> would be no reprisals and no fear of eviction. <br />