pf07-021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Pa�e 1 of 3 • • John Stark To: John Livingston Cc: Thomas Paschke; Jamie Radel Subject: RE: PUD and Re-zoning application Twin Lakes John, It is staff's initial conclusion that, in concept, your proposal includes uses (hotel and restaurant - which are identified as "Service Mix" in the Twin Lakes Master Plan) that are consistent with Roseville's comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan, which is essentially the Twin Lakes Master Plan in this area, has a great number of other requirements (such as design, materials, landscaping, etc.) that your proposal would be required to fulfill. As we've mentioned, the location of, and access to, the future Twin Lakes Parkway is contemplated in the comprehensive plan and you would need to show how this access will be accommodated. In the event that neither the City nor your development team are able to dedicate land for and/or build the initial segment of Twin Lakes Parkway (or any other required public improvement) that is needed to access the subject property, it is possible that a right-in right-out temporary access onto Cleveland will work. Any access onto Cleveland is subject to analysis by the City Engineer, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission and, ultimately, the City Council. The only representations I have made regarding the City's construction of Twin Lakes Parkway is that the City currently has no plans to construct Twin Lakes Parkway. The City always has the right (I would say the responsibility) to reassess these plans as time goes by and as development proposals are considered. It is not uncustomary to require a developer to pay for public improvements that serve the site that they are developing in a redevelopment area. Having not yet received a copy of your application or proposal, however, staff cannot give you any assurances as to our conclusion on compliance with the comprehensive plan or the most appropriate access points. Our process is that the Community Development staff and members of the Development Review Committee, which is made up of employees from other City departments, analyze the proposal before a staff recommendation is formulated. As you know, however, the City Council is the ultimate arbiter of whether a proposal meets our comprehensive plan. If the City Council concludes that your property is in conformance with the comprehensive plan, then it appears the only required land-use approvals would be: 1) a rezoning to a Planned Unit Development, and; 2) a Replat and/or subdivision that segregates the property into a development parcel (or parcels - depending on your needs) from any needed right-of-way. The following is a list of other items that may be required: - Proof of ownership interest in the property or a letter of support from the property owner; - The possible payment of a park dedication fee and/or dedication of park land; - A variety of building permits; - Purchase of sewer access credits from the Metropolitan Council (administered by the City); - Environmental review (which may be a condition set by the City Council). 03/ 19/2007