Laserfiche WebLink
-. _ <br />Draft Planning Commission Minutes Attachment D <br />PLANNING FILE 07-050 <br />Request by Melissa Olson, in conjunction with Eugene Schultz, owner of the property at <br />1940 Lexington Avenue, for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to include a <br />new/used bookstore as a permitted use in the existing multi-tenant building. <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 07-050. <br />Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed the request of Melissa Olson for a book store the sells <br />predominantly used books. Ms. Olson owns "The Bookshop," which is currently housed in the <br />Har Mar Mall, and the proposed PUD amendment would allow her to relocate her business into <br />the building at 1940 Lexington Avenue. Ms. Olson advised that the business experiences <br />approximately 30 customers per day, and she anticipated equivalent customer tra�c at the new <br />location, not anticipating that it would exceed 45 people per day. Staff estimates that this level of <br />customer traffic is consistent with a gift shop related use, currently permitted in the PUD. Ms. <br />Olson, in the future, identified a small cafe/coffee shop, that staff could support with appropriate <br />limitations compatible with the PUD and other uses in the surrounding area. <br />Staff recommended that the range of business uses as detailed in the staff report for the multi- <br />tenant building be considered. <br />Staff recommended APPROVAL of the request for an AMENDED PUD for Melissa Olson and <br />Eugene Schultz to allow the proposed range of business uses in the multi-tenant building at 1940 <br />Lexington Avenue; based on the comments and findings of Section 5, and the conditions of <br />Sections 5 and 6, and the condition of Section 7 of the project report dated September 5, 2007. <br />Discussion included existence of a joint parking agreement with the adjoining hardware store, and <br />a community cornerstone business supported by the City in the past; potential permitted uses as <br />proposed by staff that may create parking issues (i.e., daycare use); attempt to clarify the <br />definition of "physical culture and health services;" clarifcation of current permitted uses and <br />exclusions in the B-1 Zoning District and that allowed within the PUD: square footage of the <br />proposed bookstore, as well as projected growth potential a�d plans. <br />Additional discussion included further parking sufficiency for current and potential permitted uses <br />of the facility; accuracy of information on daily customer traffic by applicant; and potential for <br />additional retail in the building. <br />Staff clarified that the building currently had 3,000 square feet of vacant retail space, proposed for <br />the book store use, with a total square footage of the entire building at approximately 10,000 <br />square feet, with offce, lab and storage use in the remainder of the building. <br />Applicant, Melissa Olson, book store owner; and Gene Schultz, building owner <br />Mr. Schultz advised that the current Cryogenics facility utilized a total of 4,000 square feet, a <br />vacant 1,600 square feet in the rear of the building, and current space in the lower level to be <br />vacated by the current tenant on December 1, 2007. <br />Additional discussion discussed the availability of twenty-six (26) parking stalls for the facility; <br />employee parking and tenant use; and projected cars for the bookstore averaging 3-4 vehicles at <br />any given time. <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing, with no one appearing for or against. <br />Commissioner poherty opined that permitted retail use should be limited to 3,000 square feet <br />total. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke opined that staff was advocating for additional low-impact uses as <br />outlined in the proposed list of permitted uses; noting that even if the entire facility became retail, <br />potential tenants would recognize that parking was limited, and only low-impact uses would <br />consider the location. Mr. Paschke further opined that he saw no serious implications to on-site <br />parking; advising that offce uses are typically uses that have a greater impact than low-impact, <br />specialty retail uses. <br />Commissioner Gottfried opined that market conditions would self-regulate the site and the twenty- <br />six (26) available parking stalls. <br />