Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />11ic analysis of 2030 congcstion conditions dctcrmincd <br />that Snclling Avcnuc will cxpericncc ovcr capacity <br />conditions and will operatc at LOS F bctwccn County <br />Road B and County Road B2.111c rcmaindcr of Snclling <br />Avcnuc is projcctcd to cxpericncc LOS E."Ihc results of <br />thc 2030 projcctions arc listcd in Tablc 5-21. <br />A Minor (Auqmenter) Arterials <br />�Ihc 2030 congcstion analysis dctcrmincd that most A <br />minor (augmcntcr) artcrials will operatc undcr capacity. <br />County Road B bctwccn Snclling Avcnuc and Hamlinc <br />Avenuc is projcctcd to cxpericncc LOS E, and scvcral <br />othcr scgmcnts arc projcctcd to cxpericncc LOS D. <br />5-34 � Transportation <br />1hc results of thc congcstion analysis arc listcd in <br />Tablc 5-22. <br />B Minor Arl�erials <br />11ze 2030 congcstion analysis dctcrmincd that all B <br />minor artcrials will operatc undcr capacity.111c results <br />of thc congcstion analysis arc listed in Tablc 5-23. <br />Roadway Networkz Planning <br />RE�vicw Draft 7 <br />October2008 <br />Roadway lmprovements <br />"Il�c City's 2008 10-ycar Capital Improvemcnt Plan <br />(CIP) includcs only roadways associatcd with thc <br />Twin Lakcs rcdcvclopmcnt proposal. Bccausc thcsc <br />roads are still in carly planning stagcs, thcy arc not <br />includcd in thc capacity analysis of this transportation <br />plan."Ihcsc roadways arc conccived to bc constructed in <br />scgmcnts corresponding with adjaccnt rcdcvclopmcnt. <br />Fgurc 5-15 (2030 Planncd Roadway Improvcmcnts — <br />2008 10-ycar CIP) displays thc planned roadways as <br />dcsignatcd in thc 2008 10-ycar CIP. <br />Roadway /urisdictiona/ Classification <br />1hc Jurisdictional assignmcnt of a roadway dcscribcs thc <br />lcvcl of govcrnmcnt that owns and maintains it. Bascd <br />on an cvaluation of thc currcnt transportation systcm, <br />thcrc docs not appcar to bc a nccd for jurisdictional <br />transfcrs within Roscvillc. <br />Functional Classification <br />Dctcrmining thc appropriatc functional class for a <br />roadway involvcs a widc rangc of factors. According to <br />MnDOT guidclincs, thc critcria mcasures dccmcd most <br />uscful includc scrvicc to urban activity ccntcrs, systcm <br />continuity, land usc considcrations, routc spacing, trip <br />lcngth, traffic volumc, and control of acccss. Naturally, <br />nonc of thcsc can bc applicd indcpcndcntly, or to <br />thc cxclusion of all othcrs, in dcvcloping functional <br />systcros. Considcring only onc portion of thc dynamic <br />intcractions bctwccn transportation and land usc, thc <br />projcctcd traffic volumcs do not appcar to warrant <br />any changcs to thc currcnt functional classification of <br />roadways at this timc. Additional insight rcgarding thc <br />appropriatc functional classification for cach roadway <br />will bc gaincd by cstablishing a long-rangc vision for <br />City of Roseville <br />