My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-053
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 4:28:31 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 3:39:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-053
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 4.0 <br />2 4.1 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />--� <br />BACKGROUND <br />� <br />In January 2000, the Roseville City Council amended the Shopping Center District to <br />include more detailed site development standards. The ordinance amendment heightened <br />the requirements for 24 hour uses within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. The <br />January 2000 amendment also established each SC site and its existing site as a <br />PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. <br />8 4.2 Specifically, § 1006.01 (Establishment) reads: The SC District, as established herein, is <br />9 designed to provide for retail sales and service facilities that have integrated designs or <br />10 units within an overall plan showing all existing buildings and site improvements on the <br />11 site as of January 1, 2000, or as amended and approved by the Ci .ry thereafter. Because <br />12 this district generates high traffic volumes, the district is normally located adjacent to <br />13 and is visible from federal and/or state highways, or from county roads. The SC <br />14 Shopping Center District, serving community-wide or regional shopping needs, is <br />15 intended for areas designated SC Shopping Center areas within the Comprehensive Plan. <br />16 <br />17 4.3 Additionally, § 1006.03 (Plan Review) states: Plans for the initial construction, or <br />18 modifications, expansions, or extensions of previously approved plans for buildings or <br />19 structures in existence on January 1, 2000, that increase the total square footage or <br />20 building height of any building or structure by more than ten percent (10%), or that <br />21 increase the required number ofpublic street access points or parking spaces by more <br />22 than ten percent (10%), must be submitted and reviewed as conditional uses as stated in <br />23 Section 1011 and 108, or as a Planned Unit Development as per Section 1008 of the title. <br />24 (Ord. 1234, 12-1 S- 1999, eff. 1-1-2000) <br />25 <br />26 4.4 Har Mar Mall has a Comprehensive Land Use Map designation of Shopping Center (SC) <br />27 and a zoning designation of Shopping Center (SC). The Planning Division has concluded <br />28 that a change in an outlot's location and a proposed new structure is a Major Amendment <br />29 to the PUD as defined in § 1008 of the Roseville City Code, thus requiring consideration <br />30 and public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council as <br />31 per the following requirement: <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />a. �1006.OSA1 (Dimensional Requirements): 1. Independent outlying lots within an <br />S-C zone shall comply with the Ciry approved Shopping Center Master Plan <br />and/or Planned Unit Development. If neither exists, the B-3 zoning district <br />requirements for freestanding buildings shall apply. If the owner or developer <br />wishes to vary from the dimensional requirements herein, the developer or owner <br />may submit a setback plan wherein design conditions or other considerations <br />indicate an amendment to the master plan or Planned Unit Development. The <br />city, in its sole discretion, may determine whether the amendment to the master <br />plan or planned unit development is appropriate. Consideration of such <br />amendments shall be as stipulated in Section 1008 and the city council may <br />impose such conditions thereto as may be appropriate. <br />PF07-053_RCA_011408.doc Page 2 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.