Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, January 2, 2013 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Bartell concurred, noting that the neighbors were already experiencing the applicant not <br />148 <br />staying true to their word of what they would or would not do, leaving them little confidence for <br />149 <br />future promises. <br />150 <br />Member Strohmeier arrived at this time, approximately 7:40 pm. <br />151 <br />Chair Boerigter sought clarification from staff that boats and other items were currently being <br />152 <br />stored on the parcel and what of those items was permitted if the Interim Use moved forward; <br />153 <br />specifically the number of boats allowed stored on a parcel. <br />154 <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that he did not have any formal knowledge of what is actually stored on site or <br />155 <br />what of those items were or were not allowed to be there. Specific to ten (10) boats stored on <br />156 <br />site, Mr. Lloyd advised that City Code restricted the types of trailers and location of the boats in <br />157 <br />side, front or rear yards; however, it did not specify how many, only where they could be stored. <br />158 <br />Regarding whether the boats would still be permitted if the Interim Use was approved, Mr. Lloyd <br />159 <br />advised that they would be permitted to remain, unless the Commission put restrictions on the <br />160 <br />Interim Use approval itself, which may not be appropriate, but within its discretion. <br />161 <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke concurred, noting that a definition of whether or not the boats were <br />162 <br />considered a nuisance or storage would need to be determined. <br />163 <br />Further discussion clarified that this new proposed use for HostasDirect was not related to past <br />164 <br />storage or potential future storage of boats on a portion of property that may be sharing a back <br />165 <br />yard with the applicant. <br />166 <br />Specific to the status of the hoop structures, Mr. Lloyd reviewed the preparations begun by Mr. <br />167 <br />Linder and Mr. Carlson in October until they were made aware of a permit being needed, and as <br />168 <br />soon as they learned of the approval process required, they had immediately stopped work and <br />169 <br />left things as is pending the completion of the application process. Mr. Lloyd further clarified that <br />170 <br />the applicant was not instructed by the City to remove the hoop structures, but simply to stop <br />171 <br />further site preparation until completion of this process. <br />172 <br />Simone Vuong, 1708 Saint Albans Street <br />173 <br />Ms. Vuong specifically addressed Mr. Carlson in the audience regarding the height of the <br />174 <br />proposed shade tents (3 feet high); height of the mobile shelves (80 inches); definition of pallets <br />175 <br />(wood frames used for delivering material off a truck with use of a forklift, not proposed for this <br />176 <br />application); and projected number of trips along Saint Albans per day and per week (two trips <br />177 <br />per week); and type of fertilizer proposed for use, with Mr. Carlson noting that Hostas were low <br />178 <br />maintenance, disease-free, and didn’t require significant use of chemicals. <br />179 <br />Chair Boerigter asked that Ms. Vuong direct her questions and comments to the Commission, <br />180 <br />rather than attempting a running dialogue with Mr. Carlson in the audience. <br />181 <br />Ms. Vuong expressed concern with the potential impact and value of their home, based on <br />182 <br />neighbor comments regarding the previous business on this site; stating that had they known <br />183 <br />there was a potential for a business across the street from their home, they probably wouldn’t <br />184 <br />have purchased their home, or recommend the home for future buyers and whether the home <br />185 <br />would have resale value. Given the $45,000 already lost in their home’s market value, Ms. Vuong <br />186 <br />questioned if they would be able to recover that loss; while not attempting to put down Mr. <br />187 <br />Carlson’s operation or Mr. Linder’s property uses. Ms. Vuong reviewed other concerns, as <br />188 <br />provided in her written comments, previously noted as a bench handout at tonight’s meeting. <br />189 <br />Specific to safety concerns, Ms. Vuong asked that Mr. Carlson’s hiring process include criminal <br />190 <br />background checks of his employees to provide additional security for the neighborhood and <br />191 <br />those accessing the neighborhood during the day. Regarding aesthetics, Ms. Vuong noted their <br />192 <br />ability to view the rows of boats in the yard, especially with the clearing of brush and vegetation <br />193 <br />already done on the lot by Mr. Carlson, as well as the hoop. Ms. Vuong stated that, if the use was <br />194 <br />approved, she would prefer trees planted to improve aesthetics, and her preference for parking <br />195 <br />and access on Larpenteur Avenue versus Saint Albans. <br />196 <br /> <br />