Laserfiche WebLink
(���mprchcnsnc!�'righbourh„nd S!uJic.: C'he�.irtcriiine Drrlinc <br />proportion was higher than in most other neighbourhoods in the city. The Next Door <br />Foundation, an innovative youth agency on Milwaukee's West Side, saw a special need <br />for service iu the West Side neighbourhood. <br />According to Tatian, a First-Time Parents Program, which was developed in the <br />neighbourhood, employed paraprofessionals to visit young parents, provide counselling <br />on parenting skills, and offer friendship that would help prevent their isolation. In <br />preparing the plans, the Foundation recognised the value of having mapped information <br />that would provide clear visual evidence of the need for the program and also be used ro <br />direct resources to areas where needs were especially high: <br />The 1990 U.S. Census data include block group level data de�ailing [he age of <br />residen[s and family structure. Maps were prepared showing the location of blocks <br />H�ith higher proportions of children under age seven and with children living in Iwo- <br />parent households. Each bloc;k group on the map was shaded to denote the <br />prvpor[ion o( different popWa[ions in Ihat block. These maps clearl�� demonstrated <br />the need for a First-Time Parents Program in West Side—[here were high numbers <br />of very young children per block compared with other areas in the city. They also <br />indicated a subset o( neighbourhood blocks where there was the most cntical need <br />for fceused ouVeach (ibid. p.10). <br />Using these maps as guides, the neighbourhood was divided up into a number of <br />"service azeas" by combining clusters of block groups for maximum flexibility. A <br />selection of detailed demographic tables was prepared, customised for the service areas. <br />Recognising distinctions within the neighbourhood helped make the program <br />implementation process more sensitive to local conditions. Program organisers felt that <br />the First-Time Pazents proposal and subsequent operating plans were much more solid <br />because of the use of geographic information. The tables, maps, and additional graphics <br />both demonstrated the need and suggested specific target areas to make implementation <br />more effective. The proposal was funded, and the program has now been operating <br />successfully for several years. <br />4.2.2. Cleveland: The Community-Building Initiative <br />Tatian refers ro the study lmplementing a Theory of Change Evaluation in the <br />Cleveland Community-Building lnitiative (CCBI) (Milligan et al. 1998) that describes the <br />initiative established in 1993 in response to a report on poverty in Cleveland's <br />neighbourhoods. The CCBI was formed to implement a comprehensive community- <br />building approach to address Cleveland's persistent poverty problem. The emphasis for a <br />neighbourhood's strategy was to be an inventory of the community's assets, not its <br />deficits. <br />CCBI selected four geographic areas ("villages") for testing its approach and <br />identified groups of key stakeholders to articulate concepts of change in each of these <br />areas. This process was further refined until the key stakeholders reached a consensus. <br />The concepts of change produced by the village stakeholders identified a series of early, <br />intermediate, and long-term outcomes and related them to a set of observable indicators <br />that can be used to monitor and evaluate the success of the community-building <br />initiatives. The result was a focused plan for bringing about change in these communities. <br />-. ,..� <br />31 <br />