My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2013 9:37:33 AM
Creation date
8/21/2013 9:37:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2013
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Meeting <br /> Thursday,July 18, 2013 <br /> Page 4 <br /> this year to pursue that hiring, but rather trying to focus on stabilizing in-house <br /> firefighters to complete their probationary status. <br /> Chief O'Neill advised that the department continues to look at different methods <br /> for developing a contract in which the City would provide a certain amount of <br /> training, but the firefighter would then in turn commit to work for Roseville for a <br /> number of years, or reimburse the department for that training. However, Chief <br /> O'Neill advised that such a requirement only served to limit the pool of interest <br /> even more. Also, since the average candidate was on the younger side, while a <br /> contractual agreement may be good for the department, a candidate firefighter <br /> was seldom in the financial position to reimburse or pay for their training. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Chief O'Neill estimated the cost of <br /> training a firefighter during that 2-3 year period; with classes, payroll hours to get <br /> the candidate through all training, including haz mat, EMS, etc., the cost could be <br /> $10,000 or more per candidate. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, if a firefighter chose to remain with the <br /> Roseville Department, a firefighter also was eligible for a good Defined Benefit <br /> Plan in addition to wages, all for a part-time employee. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that new hires would not be included in the Defined Benefit <br /> Plan, but would have Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) retire- <br /> ment benefits. <br /> Chief O'Neill concurred, advising that the intent of changing to PERA was as an <br /> added incentive for candidates and the ability to transfer their service credits to <br /> other public employers; otherwise if leaving before they were vested with Rose- <br /> ville's Relief Association at ten(10) years,they lost those benefits. <br /> Identifying additional costs for each firefighter, Chief O'Neill advised that the av- <br /> erage fire turnout gear, which was custom fit, cost approximately $2,500 in addi- <br /> tion to equipment. Chief O'Neill noted that a new firefighter was new to the City, <br /> Department and firefighting, but after that short timeframe, if they walked out the <br /> door, that experience also left with them. As the City's older, more experienced <br /> firefighters left employment, Chief O'Neill noted that it would then leave the de- <br /> partment with a group of 3-5 year employees, and that it would take them a long <br /> time to gather all the skills necessary to see things from an experienced and safe <br /> operating environment. Every time it was necessary to start over, Chief O'Neill <br /> opined that is created a significant impact for the department; and without that <br /> experienced and historical expertise of long-term firefighters, the department re- <br /> mained in a constant teaching mode. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, before adding the EMS component, there <br /> didn't seem to be as much turnover; and expressed her concern with firefighters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.