My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-07_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-11-07_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2013 10:02:14 AM
Creation date
11/8/2013 10:02:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Natural Resource and TrailProjects <br />At your October meeting youreviewedanddiscussed the approach, identified projects and cost <br />estimates for the natural resource andtrail projects.Any additional progress on the Renewal <br />Program will be reported at the meeting. Comments, questionsand suggestions from the <br />Commission are welcome and encouraged. <br />Requested Commission Action <br />: Discuss and provide input/advice/recommendations <br />Staff will provide any additional information and updates to you at the meeting. <br />Park Dedication Rate Review <br />5. <br />The Commissions role is to review and recommend Park Dedication rates. This item is an effort to <br />maintain a consistent periodic review. <br />The most recent increase for residential rates was November 2011 when the rates were increased <br />from $3,000 to $3,500 per unit. Based upon the survey of other communities, system needs, CIP, <br />Master Plan outline of needs and the fact that an increase occurred within the last two yearsto <br />keep pace, it may be appropriate for the rates to remain and be reviewed again next year. <br />The Commercial Park Dedication was adjusted from 5% of FMV to 7% of FMV.Based upon the <br />survey of other communities, system needs, CIP, Master Plan outline of needs and the fact that <br />an increase occurred last year to keep pace, it may be appropriate for the rates to remain and be <br />reviewed again next year <br />Enclosed is a survey of rates in surrounding metropolitan communities. <br />Requested Action <br />: Discuss the Park Dedication rateand consider a recommendation <br />Park Board Discussion <br />6. <br />This is an item that was discussed at your joint meeting with the City Council and subsequently at <br />a Commission meeting where there appears to be interestby both groupsin studying the subject <br />further and eventually providing a recommendation to the City Council. Initially one of the areas of <br />interest to understand better was the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the Park <br />Improvement Program (PIP) as it relates to Parks and Recreation. To get the conversation and <br />awareness going, enclosed is a memo from the City Finance Director Chris Miller outlining the CIP <br />and PIP. Chris is willing to come to a future meeting for further discussion if the Commission is <br />interested. <br />Requested Action <br />: Discussion <br />Meeting Calendar for 2014 <br />7. <br />Enclosed is a draft meeting calendar for 2014 for your review and discussion. <br />Requested Commission Action: <br />Discuss and set annual meeting calendar for 2014. <br />Staff Report <br />8. <br />Other <br />9. <br />Adjournment <br />10. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.