Laserfiche WebLink
Human Rights Commission Minutes <br />October 16, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />Ms. Lohman told the Commission that Advocates understood the rights of immigrants to mean <br />that people can have their basic needs met and can participate in the civic and political life of the <br />community, and feel safe in their neighborhoods and able to trust their local institutions. She <br />emphasized that the Conversation model was meant to get a diverse range of community <br />members and to start making public this process of how a community can become inclusive and <br />welcoming. <br />Ms. Lohman then discussed her group's template for organizing a Conversation; this document <br />entitled Hosting a Community Conversation was included in the Commission's meeting packet. <br />She emphasized this organizational outline could be easily adapted to meet local needs, but the <br />heart of the program, she explained, was the small group discussions about what participants had <br />experienced in their neighborhoods and communities. She added that it was important that the <br />white mainstream community be included in order to determine whether less- than - welcoming <br />experiences in neighborhoods was unique to new arrivals or simply a response that everyone <br />struggled with. <br />Lohman explained that that the Conversation model had often lead to future action resolving <br />human rights issues and community - building efforts. She was encouraged that the Roseville <br />HRC had a small budget which would be providing food and refreshments for the event. <br />Chair Grefenberg thanked Ms. Lohman for her presentation. He said he initially favored this <br />project because the Commission would be able to collaborate with AHR and take advantage of <br />their assistance and experience with this issue and process. He added that this model fit well <br />with the Commission's goals as presented to the Council last August, as well as the Council's <br />own goals. Grefenberg added that he also favored this project because it seemed a low- energy <br />program on the part of Commission members. <br />Commission Groff asked Ms. Lohman who would take notes on the small group discussions. <br />Her response was that Commission members would be responsible for taking notes, making sure <br />the discussion was on track and that all participants had an opportunity to speak. In the best <br />situation AHR interns would take notes but their availability in the fall was limited. <br />Lohman encouraged the Commission to heavily advertise the event to draw a diverse group of <br />immigrants from the community. <br />Discussion of program implementation in Roseville: Vice Chair Brisbois stated she was <br />pleased with the conversation at the Falcon Heights community dialogue and was especially <br />pleased with the stature of the Falcon Heights residents who were present, such as the police <br />chief and council members. She expressed some confusion on the Falcon Heights Conversation <br />since she thought that program was conducted for study purposes. <br />Ms. Lohman explained that information gathered from the Falcon Heights event would possibly <br />be used in a report by AHR and the report was due in January of 2014. <br />