Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 2, 2013 <br /> Page 17 <br /> therefore did not budget for a surplus, with reasons annually for such a surplus. <br /> As an example, those surplus funds were used for storm events, and the City <br /> Council was currently poised to spend $317,000 of those reserve funds toward the <br /> 2014 budget needs. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Miller advised that at this time, <br /> that would leave approximately $50,000 based on his current projections. Mr. <br /> Miller noted that the City Council — and public— received an annual report in the <br /> spring of the following year for the prior year from the auditor with those special <br /> circumstances and other information detailed. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that an example of one such surplus situation showing up in re- <br /> serve levels would be the decertification of a tax increment financing district. <br /> Mayor Roe further noted that, the same certified report provided a "Budget" to <br /> "Actual" for the previous year, which may not correspond with reserve levels but <br /> informing discussions. <br /> In referencing the Parks & Recreation Depai tment surplus, and in his former ca- <br /> pacity as Chair of the Parks & Recreation Commission, Councilmember Etten <br /> noted that this large surplus was intentional by the Department to cut back or de- <br /> fer certain costs to increase revenue and bring the reserve closer to the target in <br /> conjunction with the Parks Renewal Program in order to accommodate any poten- <br /> tial cost overrun or need, keeping those funds in reserve. Councilmember Etten <br /> reiterated that this was very intentional budgeting that year to address potential <br /> capital expenditures coming up; and should not be seen as extra money, but actu- <br /> ally created a lot of sacrifice by department staff to make that happen. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the August 15, 2013 staff memorandum provided to the <br /> City Council provided cash level reserves; along with the certified annual finan- <br /> cial report, both providing excellent information on those tax-supported funds. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Miller confirmed that the City <br /> had originally scheduled $275,000 for the CIP, but had reduced that to $225,000. <br /> Councilmember McGehee reiterated her concerns in this reduction, as she had <br /> stated at previous meetings, cautioning that the CIP fund, only developed two <br /> years ago, should continue to be fully-funded, and not be allowed to regress into a <br /> situation similar to that of the Parks Improvement Program (PIP). Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee noted that this City Council was striving to set something in motion <br /> for future City Councils to maintain; and without that initiative, capital expendi- <br /> tures would never get back on track. Councilmember McGehee further reiterated <br /> her previous statements from past meetings regarding the need to address mainte- <br /> nance for new trails and capital improvements at parks, as well as the new fire sta- <br /> tion, in addition to any other costs that will come on line that have yet to be ac- <br /> counted for. <br />