CC_Minutes_2014_0127 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 27, 2014 Page 37 Councilmember McGehee suggested no warehousing/distribution, no produc- tion/processing, and no light manufacturing; opining she was also not necessarily supportive of HDR residential. Councilmember Willmus advised that he would need to see what the HDR pro- posal looked like before making a decision. Mayor Roe noted that, if someone came forward with a proposal that had too many units for the size of the parcel, the Council had the discretion not to approve it as they had done in the past. Specific to parcel 2830, Mr. Paschke noted that this was a pre-existing, non- conforming property, with the building currently vacant and lease expired; and the owner therefore unable to re-use the building for limited production or light man- ufacturing in accordance with state statute and Roseville Zoning Ordinance provi- sions. Mr. Paschke advised that the only way for re-use would be under HDR. Mr. Paschke noted that the question them became whether there was support for affording some properties, particularly that parcel, to continue on in that limited use in that type of building if they wanted to re-use the building; or seek a sepa- rate zoning district and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, or an Interim Use. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Paschke advised that the owner had a number of potential applicants during the one year period, but none had signed and the previous tenant's lease had expired, and at the end of September of 2013, the one year allowance for vacancy had expired. Mr. Paschke advised that the property owner now had to conform to current zoning code requirements. South of Terrace Councilmember McGehee suggested removing warehousing/distribution. Councilmember Laliberte advised that she couldn't see any residential uses on this south side unless they were HDR of 24 units or more. Councilmember Etten suggested removal of any potential LDR, as well as ware- housing/distribution. Mayor Roe suggested removal of production/processing and light manufacturing. Area 4—Fairview and County Road C - north from Byerly's to Fairview Avenue At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mayor Roe stated that there was al- ways the potential for constructing new roads given the right circumstances. Mr. Trudgeon noted that, around the cul-de-sac properties, there was a ditch with significant elevation; and while not an insurmountable issue, it was a natural bar- rier(1755 to the blue line and east of the Byerly's building).