pf_02032 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Fine Associates/Roseville Community Bank, Case No. 2032 Page 3 Lightinq The exact lighting conditions are not noted. However, fixtures similar to that which have been employed in previous areas of the PUD would be appropriate. Signing Drawing PI faintly indicates the location of a pylå'n sign on the southwesterly most island within the parking area. This location is beyond the 30 foot setback required and would be appropriate. As discussed with the applicant at Staff sessions, a single pylon is proposed at this location along with a sign on the building as indicated on the front elevation of the structure. Screening A metal screen wall is proposed on the periphery of the structure forming a parapet above the' outside walls. The exact nature of this screen, however, is not indicated on the drawings. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to question the applicant regarding this detail. However, the handling of rooftop equipment in this manner would be appropriate to the actual design of the screen with the condition that there be no signage placed on the screening material. The question as to whether or not this detail will be repeated when the second story is added is a pertinent one. Trash Handling We have suggested to the applicant that the trash be located inside the building behind an overhead door. The applicant has indicated on Sheet P3 a trash enclosure on the exterior of the structure at the northeast corner of this building. This would appear to be a very prominent location on the site, and we suggest that the trash be handled in the interior at some location other than contiguous to the inside drive-up teller. This is not a serious consideration, but another location may be more appropriate. Engineering Considerations , Attached is a copy of the Engineering Staff report. any approval be contingent on final Engineering Staff We suggest that review. Parks & Open Space A park dedication equivalent to 5 percent of the land, or the land value, is required to be dedicated to the City at the time of the filing of the Final Plat. In this case, no public park has been proposed by the City within the area of land proposed to be platted. Therefore, money in lieu of land is appropriate. The park dedication ordinance adopted by the City in June of 1989 under Section 20.155 requires that: "(a) For all land zoned other than residential, the value shall be based upon land value, exclusive of buildings and improvements and shall be 5 percent of the value."