My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02155
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2100
>
pf_02155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:42:09 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:43:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2155
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1140 WOODHILL DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE (PUBLIC W
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />We are requesting a variance from the required thirty (30) foot setback and are proposing <br />an eleven (11 ') foot setback from the east property line which is ten (10) feet further <br />back than the existing courtyard wall. Please note that for a Public Works Facility, <br />located on a Civic Center Campus, each square foot of usable space is vitally important. <br /> <br />SALTISAND STORAGE: <br /> <br />In the very near future, the State and Federal governments are going to require that <br />salt/sand storage areas be coveæd to eliminate salt leaching into ground soils. CurrentJy, <br />excess salt/sand left over from the winter is given back to Ramsey County since there is <br />no place to keep it. With the covered storage, this wouJd be eliminated. As part of this <br />project, we are proposing the utilization of the existing courtyard retaining wall. This <br />area, which is currently used for salt/sand, will be covered by a structure to keep rain and <br />snow from the storage area. The structure has been designed to combine a cost-efficient <br />structural system while at the same time keeping the profùe as low as possible. The shed <br />roof profùe was set by the equipment, which will be used within the storage area, and to <br />minimize the visual impact. To provide these minimum heights will require adding two <br />feet to the height of the retaining wall. (See section on Courtyard Wall). The darlc <br />brown standing seam roofmg will blend into the colors of the existing wall and the <br />existing complex of buildings. It is also proposed to extend the new plal1tings with <br />conifers down the east side of the courtyard wall as additional screening. <br /> <br />In conjunction with the setback variance requested in the "Courtyard Wall" section, we <br />are requesting a variance for the height of the wall both for the salt/sand shelter and for <br />the incæased shielding from view of the vehicles. This additional height is proposed to <br />be carried on to the north and then west to the proposed addition. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />9787 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.