My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0414
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2014 9:32:05 AM
Creation date
4/24/2014 9:31:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, April 14, 2014 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it made sense, and due to the broad scope of the CEC, <br /> suggested interaction with other advisory commissions as well as part of their ef- <br /> forts. While suggesting that those answers may not be readily available at this <br /> time, Mayor Roe opined that the City Council would not necessarily be opposed <br /> to those types of collaborations in the community, since the entire point was <br /> community engagement. <br /> Member Becker opined that, if the City Council wasn't immediately providing di- <br /> rection on priorities from the Task Force summary report, one of the first steps for <br /> the CEC seemed to be to identify priorities and make their recommendation to the <br /> City Council, using the report as a reference. Member Becker expressed his curi- <br /> osity with the website update coming up later in tonight's agenda, opining that <br /> since that was a key part on the Task Force recommendation list, he had some <br /> open-ended concerns in the City entering into a new contract without input from <br /> the CEC as to whether the recommended vendor supported efforts of the CEC and <br /> to what extent it met those needs. In recognizing that the vendor was offering a <br /> small upgrade fee, Member Becker opined that it was still real money and ques- <br /> tioned how long the City would be constrained by that platform versus another <br /> venue. Member Becker advised that he and other members of the CEC had <br /> thoughts they would like to share on that issue. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte encouraged members to stay and engage during those <br /> discussions. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred, or opened the floor to their feedback at this point as well. <br /> Member Mueller concurred with Mr. Becker, opining that with this opportunity to <br /> upgrade things, there may be other platforms that would be advantageous to reach <br /> a greater number of people, and she would also like an opportunity for the CEC to <br /> be involved. <br /> Member Becker opined that this would be the first link pin for someone seeking <br /> an ability to start on the website, and was important to the overall mission of the <br /> CEC. <br /> Member Grefenberg noted, having gone through the previous consultant selection <br /> and how to or not to do it, especially with the Request for Proposals (RFP's) or <br /> list of expectations that haven't been received or vetted by users of the website,he <br /> opined that it was inauspicious for the CEC to begin with the decision already <br /> having been made to hire a consultant to redesign the website and what the City <br /> was looking for in its website. Based on his last experience, Member Grefenberg <br /> opined that the CEC may have suggestions to improve the bid by CivicPlus, but <br /> also this served as a primary example of the CEC working with staff on the detail <br /> and in addressing the e-mail correspondence sent regarding this issue to the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.