My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0414
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2014 9:32:05 AM
Creation date
4/24/2014 9:31:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 14,2014 <br /> Page 8 <br /> provide recommendations for tools that could be used to meet people where they <br /> were with their busy, limited time available; and how to pass information on to <br /> those residents in their daily lives. <br /> Councilmember Willmus echoed the comments of Mayor Roe regarding use of <br /> the Task Force summary report; opining that it was an important document with <br /> lots of valuable information, and with the CEC becoming stewards of that docu- <br /> ment, it could serve to influence future decision-making. <br /> Along those same lines, Councilmember McGehee opined that a lot of the docu- <br /> ment is related to policy and process; and further opined that a lot of existing pol- <br /> icies in Roseville have not been as inclusive or rewarding when they attempt to <br /> engage the public. Councilmember McGehee noted that many discussions had <br /> been held about educating the public about changes in the community, and how to <br /> engage them in the process for topics of concern to them and how responsive the <br /> City is to those coming forward with concerns or specific issues; with a need to <br /> address implementation and policy issues needing direction. <br /> Councilmember Etten, as a caveat to previous comments, clarified that the CEC <br /> was a group advising the City Council on policy, engagement, collaboration and <br /> communication; and while recognizing that individual members of the CEC are <br /> already actively involved in the community, he didn't want to stifle those natural <br /> extensions and ongoing outreach they already provided in the community. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten spoke in strong support of members of the CEC continuing to <br /> engage in those areas on behalf of the City Council. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with Councilmember Etten's comments. <br /> At the prompting of Mayor Roe, individual feedback was sought from the CEC. <br /> Member Ramundt sought clarification, from the twenty-page Task Force sum- <br /> mary report, if the City Council had determined or ranked their priorities in that <br /> document, or identified which areas they wanted the CEC to focus on versus the <br /> entire document. Member Ramundt opined that having some initial "wins" or ar- <br /> eas of initial agreement were important, and suggested the City Council provide <br /> that information to the CEC at their earliest convenience. <br /> Mayor Roe recognized that this was a fair question. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred that it was a good point; however, with re- <br /> cent changes made to the system and in staffing since the presentation of that re- <br /> port, she suggested that the document could use a review before providing that <br /> priority listing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.