Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, April 7,2014 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Member Cartier opined that he saw one of the functions of this Commission to re- <br /> view bonding opportunities versus a day-to-day budget presentation to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the City Council was looking for policy guidance from <br /> the Commission rather than specific number crunc ing in be any g eat det tl; and <br /> how for <br /> suggestions from the Commission on how things <br /> to set aside more funds if trends indicated such measures. <br /> Member Cartier stated that he saw the Commission's focus on major dollars ver- <br /> sus operating budgets; with more concern about CIP and big ticket items, and <br /> with the assistance of Finance Director Miller,to determine what was required for <br /> new elements and current capital and bonding leverage; and providing an ade- <br /> quate cash flow for those expenditures. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the CIP subcommittee documents he previously referenced <br /> included each category and annual updates accordingly, which would address <br /> Member Cartier's consideration of those items that may be over or under-funded, <br /> and whether or not more or less bonding was indicated. Mayor Roe note that the <br /> CIP was basically set up to break even e cept for <br /> rd.ew buildings and other major <br /> categories of capital spending that <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that for a number of years, there was no annual <br /> funding set aside to address infrastructure needs or those new buildings coming <br /> on board, causing everything to be underfunded and the City unable to meet its <br /> responsibilities. Over the last four years, Councilmember McGehee noted that the <br /> City Council had attempted to address that situation; and referenced the asset <br /> management software program being put in place to track those items needing re- <br /> pair and maintenance and to plan accordingly for those items. Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that the City of Roseville had an issue specifically with the in- <br /> stallation of new pathways, that were strongly supported by residents and taxpay- <br /> ers, but without any plan in place to their long-term maintenance, repair and re- <br /> placement whether within or outside parks. With 75 miles of pathways in the <br /> City, and an estimate of $5,000 maintenance required for every mile, Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee stated that such funding had not been set aside, opining that <br /> this was on e of the things of interest to her. Noting the preferences expressed by <br /> Councilmember Laliberte for a set calendar, Councilmember McGehee also ex- <br /> pressed her preference for a method to be set to fund capital and maintenance <br /> costs; and whether that source should be bonding or use of reserves; or whether a <br /> further policy discussion was needed. In her efforts to familiarize herself with <br /> budgets, Councilmember McGehee advised that she had personally reviewed <br /> online budgets and CIP's for other cities; and had found very interesting alterna- <br /> tives and other software packages uses, some more accessible and some worse <br /> than the City's current one,but all proving interesting and useful. <br />