Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 24,2014 <br /> Page 11 <br /> For the record, Mayor Roe clarified that it had been suggested, but not con- <br /> firmed, that staff did not have adequate equipment available to monitor and de- <br /> termine sound compliance issues. <br /> 9. General Ordinances for Adoption <br /> a. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Table 1004-5 oft he Zoning Ordinance Spe- <br /> cific to the Medium Density Residential District <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed this request as detailed in the RCA dated <br /> March 24, 2014. Mr. Paschke noted one revision to the Table 1004-5 included in <br /> the meeting packet, and a potential conflict with the City's Subdivision Ordi- <br /> nance, as part of the regulating plan and map previously adopted by the City <br /> Council, and the need for further clarification as the separation for minimum pe- <br /> riphery alley setbacks related to distance. While the initial goal of staff was to <br /> clarify that, since there was no current established setback for that use, Mr. <br /> Paschke advised that until further review and analysis was performed by staff, the <br /> proposed Table 1004-5 be revised to delete that final line on the table. <br /> Mr. Paschke began his review with specifics for row homes and the nature of their <br /> design. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke specifically to the row homes in the Greater Metropolitan <br /> Housing Corporation's (GMHC) proposal along Dale Street, verifying that their <br /> proposed front yard setback is actually larger than this action would require. <br /> Mr. Paschke confirmed that they were proposing a larger setback than this would <br /> require; and that, as noted in the Table (page 5 of the RCA), that setback was <br /> based on the type of street as detailed in the footnotes immediately following the <br /> Table. <br /> Mr. Paschke further addressed the intent in setback revisions to address open are- <br /> as and front porches, and town homes, using the GMHC proposal as an example <br /> along Cope Avenue and periphery setbacks. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Paschke confirmed that staff was <br /> recommending changes for code city-wide, not specific to the Dale Street Project <br /> itself. <br /> Since the Dale Street Project was special and experimental in Roseville for this <br /> type of housing, Councilmember McGehee questioned the wisdom of changing <br /> code beyond this project, and whether it may create problems in other single- <br /> family neighborhoods, not just with the surrounding neighbors for this develop- <br /> ment. <br />