Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 24,2014 <br /> Page 21 <br /> throughout the City, or the current system. Mayor Roe opined that this would get <br /> the information from the community and define the difference between the two, <br /> while addressing the issues of Councilmembers Etten and Willmus. <br /> Councilmember Etten spoke in support of that language proposed by Mayor Roe. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she was fine with that process, with a dif- <br /> ferent question; but noted that the question had been turned over to the survey <br /> makers,based on their expertise, and resulting in a reasonable question as drafted. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if the City Council wanted to pretend that <br /> they were qualified survey makers; opining that it was not reasonable that they <br /> should re-write the survey. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the language on the draft survey provided <br /> on February 10th was simpler than this language; and included could be used; and <br /> with simply adding options (e.g. "strongly approve, approve, disapprove, strongly <br /> disapprove, don't know/refused") it would address the other issues brought up to- <br /> night. Councilmember Laliberte opined that the language in tonight's draft <br /> opened up more grey areas. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that Councilmember Etten had steered the City Council in that <br /> direction based on his comments tonight; and opined that the original language <br /> did more accurately address the information being sought. <br /> Councilmember Etten advised that he was comfortable with draft language in the <br /> agenda packet tonight, but also with the language read by Councilmember <br /> Laliberte, with the exception of the follow-up question, which he would like to <br /> see 1-2 reasons versus broader information, and if the February 10t11 draft lan- <br /> guage could have minor revisions to address concerns expressed by Councilmem- <br /> ber Willmus, he would be fine with that language as long as it mentions various <br /> zoned in accordance with current law. Councilmember Etten opined that adding <br /> Councilmember Laliberte's suggested options would address that for him. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that he was fine with the Laliberte draft as read. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she preferred to retain classifications. <br /> Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, language as agreed to on February 10, re- <br /> vised as follows (Question 82): <br /> Introduction <br /> Leave as is <br /> Question <br /> Would you favor or oppose the City of Roseville changing from the cur- <br /> rent system in which residents may choose from several different haulers <br />