Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 24, 2014 <br /> Page 22 <br /> to a system where the City chooses a specific hauler for the whole com- <br /> munity? <br /> STRIKE: "Do you feel strongly that way? What if it saved you money? <br /> ADD: Strongly Approve...1 <br /> Approve...2 <br /> Disapprove...3 <br /> Strongly disapprove...4 <br /> Don't know/refused...5 <br /> Question 83 <br /> Leave as is <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her preference for "favor" versus "oppose" <br /> and offered a friendly amendment to have graduated choices. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte advised that she did not accept that as a friendly <br /> amendment, as it creates confusion. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted it created more of a middle level of the grey area. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reiterated her preference to define changing from the <br /> current system. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that this may not matter at all, and questioned if the <br /> semantics would really change the real information being sought or the decision- <br /> making process the City Council would subsequently be engaged in, opining that <br /> it would not. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated that her intent was to avoid confusion for the <br /> questioner and respondent as to the meaning of organized versus non-organized <br /> collection. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of "in favor" or "opposed" to define how strongly <br /> they felt if that nuance was needed. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that the nuance didn't matter. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that similar surveys in other communities used <br /> "strongly favor" and "oppose." <br /> Councilmember Laliberte spoke in support of the motion as stated. <br /> Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, a FRIENDLY AMENDMENT to add at <br /> the end of the question the following language: "...[or for designated zones <br /> within the City]." <br />