2014_0512_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Interviews were conducted on all 11 packages separately with individuals from all firms. The purpose was t for them to describe their proposed plan, approach and cost estimates to the evaluation team. ., With guidance from the City Attorney, LHB and Arizona State University (ASU), request for proposals � (RFP's) were prepared and issued for all 12 project packages totaling of $12,858,800 as outlined in the � Renewal Program. Specifically the packages include: A) Buildings, Shelters and Related Site Wark B) ,. Skating Center Repairs C) Harriet Alexander Nature Center Improvements D) Bridges and Boardwalk �, E) Lighting F) Tennis Courts, G) Field Improvements H) Irrigation I) Natural Resources J) Disc Golf � Course Improvements K) B2 and Victoria Street Sidewalk K3) Pathways in Various Park Locations. All �� projects were outlined at the onset and throughout the Renewal Program. ASU monitored and provided �� education, during the City's implementation of the Best Value process for each of the 12 packages. �� A total of 4 pre-proposal education sessions were held for interested vendors. Attending at least one was � required in order to submit a proposal. At these sessions, vendors were educated on the entire process. �:� ASU was available to answer questions about the technical aspects of the process along the way; vendors �� were encouraged to make contact as needed to educate them. ASU monitored, and provided education, �� during the City's implementation of the Best Value process for each of the 12 packages. c �� �- The process for all 12 packages is now complete. The Best Value contractor has been identified in each E� package except for the Skating Center Repairs where no proposals were received. The recommendations .. below maintain the integrity, quality and program intent of the overall Renewal Program. � The Best Value Business Model has been a very thorough and time consuming process up front. Investing � this amount of time in the process up front is expected to allow for a smoother process getting started, � along the way and at the finish. Only "unforeseen" risks or client requested changes will need to be � addressed by the City. �� Attached is a typical standard City Construction Services Agreement, a Pre- Award Document and the . Best Value selection summary for all packages. The City Attorney has been involved along the way and E: will continue to provide guidance to finalize all documents. �� Included in your packet is a summary of the Best Value process from Jake Smithwick at Arizona State E University. e Included in your packet is an analysis of all proposals and a recommendation from Michael Schroeder, E: LHB and Lead Final Design Consultant. E:� Included in your packet is a recommendation letter from Kristine Giga, City Civil Engineer on the B2 and E�� Victoria sidewalk project. � Overall, this is a very unique and complex program because there are numerous projects to occur � throughout the City and the work will need to be coordinated and performed around an extensive , recreation program and high use park system. , Based upon the extensive, thorough and lengthy process; overall community involvement, program intent . and the final designs, a staff summary and recommendation for each package is below: Page 2 of 8