My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:18 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
674 COUNTY ROAD C W
Applicant
PARKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
112923110007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Parkridge Development, Case No. 2471 <br /> <br />page 6 <br /> <br />6. Adopt more flexible minimum standards for single family <br />and multi-family housing developments to allow for <br />innovative development and more efficient densities. <br /> <br />8. Encourage the development of well-designed mUltiple <br />family dwelling projects which are compatible with adjacent <br />uses. <br /> <br />10. Encourage a variety of housing types for all age <br />groups, in all stages of the life cycle. <br /> <br />A recent housing study for the City by Maxfield Research Group <br />noted the need for a broader housing base in the community, beyond <br />the predominant single-family stock. The Kehr proposal, aimed at <br />the "empty-nester", would fit part of the· need identified in that <br />study. The City is now in the middle of the vista 2000 planning <br />process, and a Housing Task Force is one of the working groups in <br />the process. This task force will provide some insight and <br />suggested direction for the Housing Element of an updated <br />Comprehensive Plan, by formulating a clearer statement of the <br />community's goals for all types of housing in the community. But <br />these new policies have not yet been developed. The work of the <br />task force will be brought to the Planning commission and City <br />Council as part of the process of developing the new comprehensive <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Zonina Considerations <br /> <br />As the property is configured and zoned now, it could be divided <br />into four deep single-family lots fronting county Road C, which <br />would match the existing development in the area. with a <br />cul-de-sac or loop street, the property might be divided into as <br />many as twelve single-family lots that would meet city standards. <br />The request for 29 townhouse units more than doubles the current <br />allowable density. <br /> <br />The city has generally considered the LR Low Density designation <br />as allowing both R-1 and R-2 zoning, but has not routinely granted <br />all rezoning requests from R-1 to R-2 in the LR area. These <br />decisions have been made on a case-by-case basis. Using the <br />minimum standards for the R-2 District, the Kehr proposal might be <br />considered low density. Code allows a duplex on a minimum <br />11,000-square-foot lot, or 5,500 square feet per unit (7.92 <br />units/acre). The parkridge Estates plan has 5,513 square feet of <br />lot area per unit, but no street right-of-way is taken out, since <br />the PUD proposes all private roads. We include these calculations <br />for information only, since we believe this approach is not in <br />line with the intent of the LR designation. We believe it is more <br />reasonable to rely on the general density ranges in the Comp Plan <br />in considering the character of a PUD, not the absolute minimum <br />standards of the R-2 District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.