Laserfiche WebLink
<br />parkridge Development, Case No. 2471 <br /> <br />page 7 <br /> <br />The zoning district in Roseville most closely associated with <br />medium density housing of this type is the R-6 Townhouse District. <br />We suggest that the Parkridge PUD be compared to the R-6 standards <br />as the underlying zoning. A comparison of the pertinent standards <br />and the parkridge project is as follows: <br /> <br />Uses: Permitted uses are structures of three to eight <br />units, of townhouse type, sharing a common wall, having <br />individual front and rear entrances and privacy walls <br />separating the rear yards of adjacent units. Two family <br />units are allowed by Special Use Permit. The Parkridge plan <br />has two-unit to five-unit structures, all with private <br />entries as required, but not the privacy walls. We believe <br />the design of the units is acceptable and in keeping with <br />quality projects in today's market.· Privacy walls are not <br />essential. <br /> <br />Densitv: Required m~n~mum lot area per unit is 4,000 <br />square feet, or 13.2 units per acre. Parkridge has 5,513 <br />square feet per unit, or 7.9 units per acre. <br /> <br />Setbacks: <br /> <br />Front 30' <br />Side 15' or 3/4 of structure height. <br />Rear 30' <br />Structures must be 35' apart. <br /> <br />The Parkridge proj ect meets all these setbacks except the <br />distance between structures, which is typically 20'. Given <br />the design of the parkridge units, we feel this setback is <br />acceptable. <br /> <br />Heiqht: <br /> <br />The height limit is 30', which all structures in the <br />Parkridge plan meet. <br /> <br />Landscapinq <br /> <br />The landscape plan is general in nature and does not indicate <br />sizes or species, only "overstory Tree", "Evergreen", "Shrub", <br />etc. The amount of landscaping shown is very minimal for a project <br />of this size and character. Some specific comments are in order, <br />however: <br />