Laserfiche WebLink
<br />parkridge Development, Case No. 2471 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />other details of the plan are considered. selecting one set of <br />criteria, a positive conclusion could be reached; using different <br />criteria, the opposite could be found. <br /> <br />The larger context of the site includes higher density development <br />(townhouses and condominiums) in the quadrant northeast of the <br />intersection of Dale street and County Road C (see Context Plan). <br />Vacant land in the southeast quadrant of that intersection is <br />guided DR High Density Residential. West of Dale street, the area <br />consists of. single-family neighborhoods wi th Central Park to the <br />south. Closer in, the site is bounded by a busy County road on the <br />north, a large institutional use (the American Legion) to the <br />southwest, and the park to the south. This mix of adjacent uses <br />might be compatible with a medium density 4evelopment. <br /> <br />Immediately adjacent to the site, however, are single-family homes <br />to the west, east, and north across County Road C. The proposed <br />project would build 29 new housing units whose sole street access <br />is to County Road C. These considerations would argue for <br />continued low density development. <br /> <br />The project is designed with a U-shaped private street accessing <br />County Road C. Mr. Kehr has attempted to purchase the adjacent <br />lot to the east (Borgstrom property) and other properties out to <br />Dale street. It has been suggested that all or part of the <br />American Legion property may be redeveloped some day. The <br />Parkridge project is designed to be able to connect easily either <br />to the east or west, if these properties become available. <br /> <br />The question of the ultimate extension of this land use into the <br />whole block of properties bounded by County Road C, Dale street, <br />Central Park, and the American Legion is crucial to the decision <br />on this proj ect. This was true when the previous proj ect was <br />proposed. A condition of approval suggested in the 1985 <br />application was the acquisition of roadway easements through the <br />neighboring properties east to Dale street. This would have <br />provided an east-west through street south of county Road C to <br />serve this development. Testimony of the city's planner, Howard <br />Dahlgren, in the 1985 case notes: <br /> <br />"City representatives consistently emphasized to [Mr. Kehr] <br />that the reasonableness of his project was dependent upon <br />the extension of a higher densi ty of housing development <br />easterly through contiguous properties to Dale street. <br />However, the property owners whose property would have been <br />so affected did not support the proj ection of such use on <br />and through their properties. In fact, some of these <br />affected property owners stated strong opposition to such <br />project development. <br />