My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:18 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
674 COUNTY ROAD C W
Applicant
PARKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
112923110007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />parkridge Development, Case No. 2471 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />"Although the city has approved development such as that <br />proposed by [Mr. Kehr] where the development constitutes a <br />transition use between business or high density residential <br />uses and a low density residential use, the city has never <br />granted approval for development of a project of this <br />density on a lot of this size·where such density creates an <br />enclave of medium density development in the middle of a <br />single family residential area having large lots and <br />substantial open space". <br /> <br />It is this. idea of creating an "enclave" of townhouses within a <br />single-family area that distinguishes this project from other <br />similar projects in the city, such as Can-Am, Rottlund/Concordia, <br />or the various proposals on the Busse property. standing by <br />itself, we believe the project has weaknesses; tied ultimately <br />into the larger city street network and adjacent neighborhoods, <br />the project is stronger. In this context, if the Parkridge <br />project is approved the City should be willing to extend the HR <br />designation east and west from this property and insure that the <br />roadway system serves the area, as illustrated on the attached <br />map, possible Land Use Guide Change. <br /> <br />Mr. Kehr has had several neighborhood meetings with area <br />residents, including some with city staff at City Hall. Mr. Kehr <br />and these neighbors will be able to comment on their current <br />feelings about this land use in their neighborhood. In the <br />meetings we attended, neighbors across county Road C had strong <br />objections to the proposal. Among the objections were: <br /> <br />Densitv. The scale of the project was seen as out of <br />character with the existing large-lot single-family homes in <br />the immediate area. <br /> <br />Traffic. Traffic would be higher than the current condition <br />or a maximized single-family plan on the property, and would <br />be concentrated at the two driveway openings to County Road <br />c. The neighbors are correct in assuming higher traffic <br />concentrations due to the project, but it would not be <br />proportionally higher, because townhouses typically generate <br />less traffic per unit than single-family homes. Based on <br />average trip generation rates, the 29 townhouse units would <br />generate about the same total traffic as 18 single-family <br />homes. If a street were eventually extended from this area <br />east to Dale street, it would relieve some of the traffic <br />onto County Road C. <br /> <br />Related to the traffic is a concern over headlights shining <br />into homes across County Road C. The plan has the two <br />driveway openings aligned with two existing driveways on the <br />north side of County Road C, which addresses this concern. <br />Residents opposite any city street intersection would face <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.