My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02497
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:00 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2497
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
725 LARPENTEUR AVE W
Applicant
GOERTZ, ROCKNE
Status
APPROVED
PIN
132923240016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CasePage <br />No. <br />planonly for the smallest berm.Weassumethenumberofplants <br />willbeincreased proportionally forthelongerberms.theexisting <br />vegetationaroundthepondisbeing left asis,andnoadditional <br />landscapingproposednorthofthesewereasement. <br />Theplan for therestoftheproject is minimalandcouldbe <br />improved <br />planting is shown on thewestsideofthesite <br />adjacenttothecemetery.ThepreviousHeritage proposal had <br />alineofredcedarstoscreenthisedge.rowsometype <br />oftallerevergreens would be appropriate. <br />Theplantingbeds next toeachstructure are shown <br />wide.Theseshouldbeatleastwidetosupportshrubs. <br />Thesidewalkleadingintoeachunitshownwide.We <br />recommendminimum. <br />Thearoundeach building and entry <br />Thequantitiesshouldbeincreasedbyat least aswell <br />asaddingornamentals such ascraboramur maple, and <br />evergreens(none are shown).Themockorangeshouldbe <br />spacedmaximum. <br />Thesizesforallplantmaterialsshould conform to <br />minimumstandards:caliperoverstory <br />trees,height for evergreens, 5gallon pot forshrubs. <br />Considerations <br />Anadditionalofrightofwaydedicationis needed for <br />LarpenteurAvenue.Theapplicanthasindicatedhecanrevisethe <br />planandstillprovidethesetbacksnotedthezoning analysis <br />above.sidewalkneedstobeconstructedalong Larpenteur Avenue. <br />Wehavehaddiscussions with thedeveloper about utility services <br />fortheprojectsincetheattacheddrawings were submitted.We <br />have worked oututilityconnectionsandeasementsin an arrangement <br />somewhat different thanwhatshown on thedrawingsfor <br />drainage, sewer, andwater service (describedbelow).The <br />applicantwillpresenttheserevisedplansatthemeeting. <br />StormTheneighbors across SweeneyPond were very <br />concerned about storm drainage into thepondintheprevious <br />proposal.Thatprojectwasconsiderablymore dense and had much <br />morehardsurfacethantheGoertzproject.AlthoughtheCityhas <br />noadoptedstandards that wouldrequire retention or treatment of <br />stormwater before discharging into Sweeney Pond, wecanimpose <br />additionalreasonable standards onatogivebenefittothe <br />Cityexchangeforflexibilityonotherstandards within thePUD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.