My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02505
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:48:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2505
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
10 ROSEDALE CENTER
Applicant
COMPUTER CITY/BEECHWOOD ACQ
Status
APPROVED
PIN
122923140002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />14 April 1993 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2505 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Beechwood Acquisitions <br />(for Computer City) <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />Snelling Avenue & County <br />Road B-2 <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Special Use Permit <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />computer city is a retail chain specializing in computer hardware <br />and software. They want to construct a new store on the vacant <br />parcel on county Road B-2 and snelling in front of the Crossroads <br />Shopping Center. The parcel is zoned se Shopping center which <br />requires 100' front setbacks. This would be unreasonable for such <br />a small parcel and computer City wants a variance to this <br />standard. site plans in the se District have been processed by <br />means of a special Use Permit. The Code specifically notes that <br />such a permit application can contain a setback plan requesting <br />variances to the required standards. There are several similar <br />cases in the city of permits granted for development in the se <br />with significant variances to the setback standards. <br /> <br />2. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The site is triangular in shape and is about 220' deep north-south <br />at the widest part. clearly a 100' setback would be a hardship <br />for this size of parcel. Since the uses in the se District are <br />compared to the B-2 District, it is reasonable to compare this <br />site plan to the B-2 standards. Those standards are: <br /> <br />Building Setback: <br />Front 30' <br />Side 10' <br />Rear 20' <br /> <br />Parking Setback: <br />Front 15' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.