Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />t:::J <br /> <br />. <br />.. <br />c. <br />o <br /> <br />~O <br /> <br />LAND USE/CIRCULATION ALTERN~TIVES <br />EXHIBIT 4: SCALE 1"-200' <br />FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT No <br />ALL PARCELS BETWEEN KERR AND DALE .S,TREET <br />PLUS FUTURE STREET CONNECTIONS . <br /> <br />Exhibit .. <br /> <br />1. Exhibit 4 illustrates a potenÛII configuration ofbuUdings. usumin¡ the incorpol'Jtion of <br />all oftbe properties to the east ofKchr. It is only an illustration for discussion purposes. <br />This change is unUkely to OCCUJ' any time lOOn because the two properties (Britz and <br />Booth) appear to be in good condition. Mr. Britz apoko in opposition to the change at the <br />Council hearing. (Mr. Booth stated be wu concerned about being left as an "island" and <br />increased tax~). <br /> <br />2. At. Figure 4 mows, the combination of the nonhern half of the Salverda property. with the <br />Britz and Bomb parcels would allow approxitnate1)' 6 units to be built. No driveway <br />would have direct acceøs ONO County Road C. This would only occur if all three of the <br />owners a¡reed to sell They would control the situation completely. In the meantime, the <br />MR designation would be an asset to them adding flexibility for the future. <br />3. The Kehr~Borsstrom~SaJverda-Britz and Booth 39 unit development will,dd <br />approximately 58 new residents. generate between 240 and 270 total traBic movements (in <br />and out) IIId add an estimated S5.8 miJlion in new housing development. <br />