Laserfiche WebLink
<br />residents, generate between 210 and 235 total traffic movements (in and out)~ and add <br />an estimated $5.1 miUion in new housing development. <br /> <br />Exhibit 4 <br /> <br />1. Exhibit 4 illustrates a potential configuration of buildings, assuming the incorporation <br />of all of the properties to the east of Kehr. It is only an illustration for discussion <br />purposes. This change is unlikely to occur any time soon because the two properties <br />(Britz and Booth) appear to be in good condition. Mr. Britz spoke in opposition to the <br />change at the Council hearing. (Mr. Booth stated he was concerned about being left <br />as an "island It and increased taxes). <br /> <br />2, As Figure 4 shows, the combination of the northern half of the Salverda property, with <br />the Britz and Booth parcels would allow approximately 6 units to be built. No <br />driveway would have direct access onto County Road C. This would only occur if all <br />three of the owners agreed to sell. They would control the situation completely. In <br />the meantime, the MR designation would be an asset to them adding flexibility for the <br />future. <br /> <br />3. The Kehr~Borgstrom-Sa1verda-Britz and Booth 39 unit development will add <br />approximately 58 new residents, generate between 240 and 270 total traffic <br />movements (in and out) and add an estimated $5.8 million in new housing <br />development. <br /> <br />Redevelopment of Properties to the West <br /> <br />1. The key to the future of the area to the west of the Kehr Property is the American <br />Legion parcel. They have officially stated that they have no CUITent plans to change <br />the use of this site. The two single family lots that front on County Road C would be <br />expensive and have limited potential for redevelopment without the broader context of <br />the American Legion Property. Both of the single family lot owners are opposed to <br />any change. <br /> <br />2. The transition between MR and LR can be effectively made at the west property line <br />of the Kehr PUD. (This transition is made somewhat more difficult since the garage <br />and retaining wall on the property to the west of Kehr actually encroach onto the Kehr <br />Property). This can be reviewed in greater detail with the review of the PUD. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />1. Through the VISTA 2000 process and the work that has been done to date on the <br /> <br />4 <br />