My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02726
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2726
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Status
APPROVED
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DAHLGREN <br />SHARDLDW <br />AND.UBAN <br /> <br />It-rCORPORATED <br /> <br />CONSUL TING PLANNERS <br />LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS <br />300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH <br />SUITE 210 <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 <br />612'339,3300 PHONE <br />612.337'5601 FAX <br /> <br />DATE: April 24, 1996 <br /> <br />TO: Marty Harstad <br />Harstad Homes <br />2195 Silver Lake Road <br />New Brighton, MN 55112 <br /> <br />FROM: Wally Case <br /> <br />RE: Owasso Hollow Rear Yard Setback - Porch Encroachment <br /> <br />I spoke with Mike Falk regarding the rear yard setback requirements for Owasso Hollow. Mike <br />indicated that because the project is a Planned Unit Development, the setback requirements are <br />controlled by the approved PUD plans and Development Agreement. He reviewed the <br />Development agreement and found no specific rear yard setback other than by reference to the <br />Site Plan adopted May 8, 1995. This site plan shows the rear setback distance between the south <br />property line and the porch or deck portion of units 13 - 20, at approximately 25-feet. <br /> <br />Based on his review of the PUD Agreement and our discussion of the setbacks shown on the <br />plan, Mike determined that the approved setback for the units in question is 25 feet to the <br />porch! deck. <br /> <br />In Mike's official opinion, your request for a 11- 611 encroachment into this setback represents a <br />minor change in the location of the units needed to adjust to drafting, site surveying and <br />construction tolerances and that this minor change is justified and needed to implement the plan <br />as approved. <br /> <br />Mike indicated that you should submit your plans for building permits for these units, requesting <br />the necessary reduced setbacks, and that the City will review and approve the discussed reduction <br />as a minor change through the PUD ordinance and will then document their action for the file. <br /> <br />cc: Mike Falk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.