Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SENT BY:NORTHSTAR RESTAURANTS 6- 5-95 <br /> <br />16:17 ;NORTHSTAR RESTALJRANT-I <br /> <br />612 490 2275i#13/16 <br /> <br />James R. Bresnalmn <br />23 Jan"ary~ 1995 <br />Pase2 <br /> <br />MluJical Q(fJOB Bu.ilding Trips. <br /> <br />A vcrago dlUly wee1cday trtps are ~ecf at 224 (in and. Ql1t)- Trips during tIus PM Peak Hour ~e <br />e$fiml\.ted at 29 (8 in ~d 21 O\lt) white 1"1" for 1ho PI;1nk "-our 01 the OffiCI!! Bundi~g (Msumed <br />here to be 1.2 pm) aro elJt.imft.w at 30 (18 in and 12 out)_ It can gcncn\11y be MSumcd thAt most <br />trips to and from Ute medical office building are new to the area. and not tied to other uses on site or <br />to traffio already on the actiacent roadway. For pu!poses of compariSOI\ II. 10% reduction in the <br />above trips to BCCUWlt for passby trips (using the roadway Wlyway) will be a55um~ Till;: <br />assumed distn"bution oftrlpJ in and out between 12 noon and 8 pm is shown in TABLE 1, <br /> <br />DriVe..," Bank Trip, <br /> <br />Averaso daily weekday trips arc "tima.tcd at 1258 based 'Upon sqQare f'ootaae Qnd 955 booed UPQn <br />tho three drive-thru lanes. To ensure a conservative comparison between land uses, the tower of <br />the two cstimittes is U!ced here. An hourly distribution of trips on Friday based upon previous <br />smdies flu~ested a peak betweon 4 pm and 7 pm. Trips duting the PM Peak Hour are estimated at <br />106 (.13 ill and 53 out) while trips for the Peilk Hour Qft1u'l Bank (assumed he=re to be' 12-1 pm) ar~ <br />estima.ted at 124 (62 in artd 62 out). BeI::L\use of the dri"'6~in na.ture ofdte bank, it C31l be asswned <br />that :\tot an ofthC$C tripli WeI n(JW tQ the $hJdy area, To provtd.;;:JI, rot1~CiV~tivc "Qmpa.riIJQI1~ a trip <br />reduction fb.ctClr of 25% has been assumed to account for passby trips. The assumed distribution of <br />trips In and out botween 12 noon and 8 pm is shown in TABLE 1. <br /> <br />llies. P.lu., Trips <br /> <br />Data for Tires Plus is based upon observations by Yaggy Colby Associatcs and Institute at <br />Trnnsportation Engineers Trip Generation data. For an 8-bay facility. 40 inbound trips pet day <br />are anticipated. For purposes of a ~qnservativa comparison, this is assumed to b", 50 inbound and <br />$0 outbound trips per day. rt is asswned that all oftbese trips are new to the study arM. The <br />assumed distribution of trips iI1 and out between 12 noon and 8 pm is shown in TABLE 1. <br /> <br />lml('l1" Chicken 1'rtp1; <br /> <br />Dl:tailed duta on tran:im:ltions by day at week and time of day havo been provided by Boston <br />Chicken. It has also been noted that a typical oar may cany from 2 to 4 customers duting the <br />lun~h period (Ham - 4 pn'L). However, for purposos of conservative comparison, a maximum auto <br />occupancy of 1.8 per car d\lring lundl pud 1.3 per car during t1m afternoon and evening has been <br />assumed, Boston Chicken also noted that approximately 30% ofbusiQess is drivcMby so that a <br />reduction of 30% in the new number ofvehicle!il on the roadway 00$ betm assuIm!tt. 'The Q~umed <br />distribution ottrips in and out between 12 noon and 3 pm ill shown in TABLE 1. <br /> <br />Findings <br /> <br />A comparison of total inbound and outbound trips for the originaL and revi$ed land uses in the <br />PUD aN shown in TABLE 2. Estimated total trips (ipbQ\lnd ~d C)ut1;)(lUnd) ani also shQwn in <br />EXmBIT 1. <br />