My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02814
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:12:28 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2814
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
1655 STANBRIDGE AVE
Applicant
PITTROFF, STACEY JEAN
Status
APPROVED
PIN
042923140022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. Ms. Pittroff's proposed operation will not be a commercial or business use in the nonnal <br />sense of the word. With one operator and one customer at a time by appointment only, <br />the disruption to the neighborhood will be minimal. Home occupations are not an <br />encroachment of typical commercial activity into a neighborhood. In past considerations <br />of requests for conditional use permits for one operator beauty salons in residential <br />districts, the Planning Commission has considered the following additional conditions of <br />approval: <br /> <br />a. Defining the hours business is conducted during the week. <br />b. Stipulating that there shall be no more than two client cars at a time and that those <br />cars must be parked off street. <br />c. That the conditional use permit is issued to the applicant only and shall <br />automatically expire upon the sale of the property. <br />d. That there shall be no product sales on the site except for sale of products to <br />individuals at the time the service is rendered if appropriate. <br />e. That there shall be no other employees providing service and that the business shall <br />not occupy more than one room of the house. <br />f That the structure must meet life safety, exiting criteria of the City Codes. <br />g. That the non-lighted sign be no more than 3 square feet. <br />h. That non-compliance by the applicant with any of the conditions can be grounds <br />for immediate revocation of the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />6. Because there are no physical changes to the property, engineering staff review is not <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Plannine Commission Comments: <br /> <br />1. The Planning Commission, at the April 10, 1996 meeting, unanimously <br />recommended approval of Stacey Jean PittrofJ's request for a conditional use permit <br />request to operate a cosmetology business from her home at 1655 Stan bridge <br />Avenue and to approve the draft resolution with the foDowing conditions: <br /> <br />a. The hours of operation shall be 9:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., Monday through <br />Saturday. <br />b. Stipulating that there shaD be no more than two client cars at a time and that <br />those cars must be parked ofT street. <br />c. That the conditional use permit is issued to the applicant only and shaD <br />automaticaDY expire upon the sale of the property. <br />d. That there shall be no product sales on the site except sale of products to <br />individuals at the time the service is rendered if appropriate. <br />e. That there shaD be no other employees providing service and that the <br />business shaD not occupy more than one room of the house. <br />f. That the structure must meet life safety exiting criteria of the City Codes. <br />g. That the non-lighted sign be no more than 3 square feet. <br />h. That non-compliance by the applicant with any of the conditions, can be <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.