Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br />! <br /> <br />square foot building with sufficienVpa.rk.i,ngJ9nth~,~!!~re,quiresparkihgsetbackvariances. The <br />propesal, as originallydesighetl, had 20f()9t'g~~p.g~e,tb~c~~raclja~enttopublic streets. <br /> <br />l\ <br />[~ <br />[" <br />Ii <br />~' <br /> <br />City staff hassugg~st~d and the 4e,ye,IQBe,1")h~~agr~eJl to. shift the building and parking 20 feet to. <br />the north and20feetto theea$pito previde the r~q\1ire,(i;4Qfq()t~etgacksal(>ng Twin Lakes <br />ParkwayandialQhgCleyelandA.yel1l1~: This would ;auQw';foraa(iition~ ~ttireright-of-way er <br />e,~semerttsasrnaybel1eede,dinth~fi1fure,lor Twin Lakes Parkway. This would also. reduce the <br />number efvariances needed ITem ,~tt();lf The remaining variance would be for a zero setback on <br />the east property line,adjaceptto:MountSJgge,E..oad. Hewever, the 50 foet Mt. Ridge Read <br />right-of-way Itlay hotbeneed,ed or the read may be t;\aJ,TQ'\Yedtqa~4t028fQ,Ot driveway in the <br />future because adequateaccesstoadj~ce,ntsi~e,s(;aI1.ge,PfPy~de,dITome?4sting streets in the area. <br />The proposed building as currently designed would also. net meet the State Building Code <br />because it would net have the required ($9{ootse,patation:ITom the nerth preperty line. The <br />following alternatives are available for meeting the building cede issue previeusly mentiened: <br /> <br />1. Provide a Qnehoq1'ratedCQllstrnction: This weuld add censiderable expense to. the <br />construction of the building. <br />2. Provide anlifeasepara#ortWall to essentially divide the building into. two. separate <br />attached buildings which would then meet the building cede requirements. This again <br />adds cost to the construction of the building and also. reduces the flexibility ef the building. <br />3. Apply for a varia.nceJotpe,iQuil(iipg.code': <br />4. Reduce the size of the building to maintain a 60 foot required separation. This alternative <br />would require an amendment to the develepment agreement between Ryan Companies <br />and the City. <br />5. ,.Granta20footpark.i,ngsetback.varian,cefadjacent to. Twin Lakes Parkway to. the seuth. <br />6. ReyieWaI1d.revisethe.40ifgo!parkirtg,s~tbackre,quireme1}t within the City Code (Sectien <br />1007.01Al) <br /> <br />Ci1Y Code Requirements: <br /> <br />Section 1007.01Al, xeq\1iresthat'R~~l1gbe,!~e,e,P.\P!JU9ings;aI19P\19lic.streetsbe set back at least <br />40feet. Therefore,aVariahc~'(jf~O,fe,,~~',i~:f~cip(~fiIl'th1s case aleng the east side. The City <br />Code, Section l.or~:Qg, indicates that wnefe'thete~area)..acticatdifficulties or unusual hardships in <br />the. way ofcarryingoutthestIiqt.proy!~igl1~ql't1Y~!sq4e,.Jl1.e,GityCouncil may vary provisions in <br />thecode.in.han:nony~ththe.g~A~r~P1jtPQs~'lt.11gjntent.therebf md 'may impose additional <br />coriditioris:as"it.'coIl.siders'riec~ssa.ry~sQ;;~ti;tA~:Pijplic'hea.Ifh;;sarety~aridgeneral welfare may be <br />secured. It is COJnp1unityp~ye~qpJ11~l1tP~p~me,P!;~l~$'ol'ini.Qi1 that there are, practical <br />diffi9ultieson this' site.8J1(j fUt!Jr,,e,Jde,X~JpPJ11~ntCPAsiderationsfqr' granting the variances <br />requested. These include the following: . <br /> <br />1. The site issurroundedbYPupijc$l[~etright~of-wayonthree,sides. <br />2. The developer iscoAtrach!aIlYP1?ligat~dl,ydevelopment agreement with the City to. <br />provide! 05, OOOsquare'feetbrithe;site, <br />3 . There is a potential need.for.adciitiopa.Iright+of..wayor easementsITom the site in question <br />ferthefutlire develepmentofTWihLakesParkway.Twin Lakes Parkway is intended to. <br /> <br />(2) <br />