<br />r
<br />!
<br />
<br />square foot building with sufficienVpa.rk.i,ngJ9nth~,~!!~re,quiresparkihgsetbackvariances. The
<br />propesal, as originallydesighetl, had 20f()9t'g~~p.g~e,tb~c~~raclja~enttopublic streets.
<br />
<br />l\
<br />[~
<br />["
<br />Ii
<br />~'
<br />
<br />City staff hassugg~st~d and the 4e,ye,IQBe,1")h~~agr~eJl to. shift the building and parking 20 feet to.
<br />the north and20feetto theea$pito previde the r~q\1ire,(i;4Qfq()t~etgacksal(>ng Twin Lakes
<br />ParkwayandialQhgCleyelandA.yel1l1~: This would ;auQw';foraa(iition~ ~ttireright-of-way er
<br />e,~semerttsasrnaybel1eede,dinth~fi1fure,lor Twin Lakes Parkway. This would also. reduce the
<br />number efvariances needed ITem ,~tt();lf The remaining variance would be for a zero setback on
<br />the east property line,adjaceptto:MountSJgge,E..oad. Hewever, the 50 foet Mt. Ridge Read
<br />right-of-way Itlay hotbeneed,ed or the read may be t;\aJ,TQ'\Yedtqa~4t028fQ,Ot driveway in the
<br />future because adequateaccesstoadj~ce,ntsi~e,s(;aI1.ge,PfPy~de,dITome?4sting streets in the area.
<br />The proposed building as currently designed would also. net meet the State Building Code
<br />because it would net have the required ($9{ootse,patation:ITom the nerth preperty line. The
<br />following alternatives are available for meeting the building cede issue previeusly mentiened:
<br />
<br />1. Provide a Qnehoq1'ratedCQllstrnction: This weuld add censiderable expense to. the
<br />construction of the building.
<br />2. Provide anlifeasepara#ortWall to essentially divide the building into. two. separate
<br />attached buildings which would then meet the building cede requirements. This again
<br />adds cost to the construction of the building and also. reduces the flexibility ef the building.
<br />3. Apply for a varia.nceJotpe,iQuil(iipg.code':
<br />4. Reduce the size of the building to maintain a 60 foot required separation. This alternative
<br />would require an amendment to the develepment agreement between Ryan Companies
<br />and the City.
<br />5. ,.Granta20footpark.i,ngsetback.varian,cefadjacent to. Twin Lakes Parkway to. the seuth.
<br />6. ReyieWaI1d.revisethe.40ifgo!parkirtg,s~tbackre,quireme1}t within the City Code (Sectien
<br />1007.01Al)
<br />
<br />Ci1Y Code Requirements:
<br />
<br />Section 1007.01Al, xeq\1iresthat'R~~l1gbe,!~e,e,P.\P!JU9ings;aI19P\19lic.streetsbe set back at least
<br />40feet. Therefore,aVariahc~'(jf~O,fe,,~~',i~:f~cip(~fiIl'th1s case aleng the east side. The City
<br />Code, Section l.or~:Qg, indicates that wnefe'thete~area)..acticatdifficulties or unusual hardships in
<br />the. way ofcarryingoutthestIiqt.proy!~igl1~ql't1Y~!sq4e,.Jl1.e,GityCouncil may vary provisions in
<br />thecode.in.han:nony~ththe.g~A~r~P1jtPQs~'lt.11gjntent.therebf md 'may impose additional
<br />coriditioris:as"it.'coIl.siders'riec~ssa.ry~sQ;;~ti;tA~:Pijplic'hea.Ifh;;sarety~aridgeneral welfare may be
<br />secured. It is COJnp1unityp~ye~qpJ11~l1tP~p~me,P!;~l~$'ol'ini.Qi1 that there are, practical
<br />diffi9ultieson this' site.8J1(j fUt!Jr,,e,Jde,X~JpPJ11~ntCPAsiderationsfqr' granting the variances
<br />requested. These include the following: .
<br />
<br />1. The site issurroundedbYPupijc$l[~etright~of-wayonthree,sides.
<br />2. The developer iscoAtrach!aIlYP1?ligat~dl,ydevelopment agreement with the City to.
<br />provide! 05, OOOsquare'feetbrithe;site,
<br />3 . There is a potential need.for.adciitiopa.Iright+of..wayor easementsITom the site in question
<br />ferthefutlire develepmentofTWihLakesParkway.Twin Lakes Parkway is intended to.
<br />
<br />(2)
<br />
|