My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02885
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:20:30 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:25:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2885
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
SOUTHWIND OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />12. dead sugar maple tree must be replaced between 2109 and 2105 Albemarle <br /> <br />The city will go out and identify the trees that have not been planted or have died, and <br />require the builder to replace or plant them. <br /> <br />3. Other Concerns: <br /> <br />A. Retention Pond <br /> <br />1. The retention pond, in it's present condition, is unsightly. The incline is too <br />steep to mow and the grass seed has not germinated. There is an abundance of <br />weeds. <br /> <br />The city checked the grade of the pond and claims that the elevation is within the <br />requirements. It had to be designed and signed off on by a Civil Engineer. The <br />builder does not like the looks of it either. He is examining the seeding. <br /> <br />2. Because of the steep incline and the depth, it is potentially dangerous. <br /> <br />The city or the builder is not responsible to put up railings or safety devices. <br /> <br />B. Power for Irrigation System <br /> <br />1. The builder has hooked up power for the irrigation system to 2112 Albemarle <br />and has advised the Townhome Association that they are required to pay the <br />homeowner for electricity. The builder has said that they "were told verbally <br />and in writing to complete the system this way." We cannot determine who <br />told him to do it that way. Would it be within the purview of the City? This <br />arrangement is unacceptable to the Townhome Association. The Association <br />wants the irrigation meter to be installed on the south side of the sprinkler house. <br /> <br />The city would not have gotten involved in this. It would have been NSP. The <br />Association could contact NSP and have the electricity installed with a separate <br />meter. <br /> <br />c. Water shutoffs <br /> <br />1. There is controversy over whether the water shutoffs are within the City <br />specifications regarding height. <br /> <br />The city will inspect. They thought that the builder might be waiting for final <br />landscaping. The shutoffs have a 12-16" sleeve that can be adjusted. <br /> <br />D. Exterior of Buildings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.