Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A.M. Peak Hour Intersection level of Service <br /> <br />Intersection Existing No Build Build <br />County Road B2ICleveland Signalized B B B <br />County Road B2/Long Lake Road Unsignalized B C E <br />County Road B2/Long Lake Road Signalized - - B <br />County Road B2IPrior Avenue Unsignalized F F F(a) <br />County Road B2IPrior Avenue Signalized - - B <br />County Road C/Long Lake Road Signalized C C C <br />West. Cleveland Service Road/Cleveland Avenue C/B(b) C/B(b) D/B(b) <br /> <br />(a) Meets peak hour volume signal warrants <br />(b) Eastbound approach/Northbound left approach level of Service <br /> <br />Blllild Condition Recommendations <br /> <br />· County Road B2 and Cleveland Avenue: Do nothing. <br /> <br />· County Road B2 and Long Lake Road: Signalize with a two-phase signal based on <br />Level of Service problems. <br /> <br />· County Road B2 and Prior Avenue: Signalize with a two-phase signal based on Level <br />of Service problems and peak-hour-volume warrants. <br /> <br />· County Road C and Long Lake Road: Optimize signal timing. <br /> <br />· Cleveland Avenue and West Cleveland Service Road: Continue to monitor operations <br />at this intersection. Turning prohibitions may be justified to improve operations and <br />safety. <br /> <br />· St. Croix Street and the North 36 Service Road: Do nothing. <br /> <br />23. VE~hicle-related air emissions. Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's <br />tr;llffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the <br />efJrect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. <br />(If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult "EA W Guidelines" about <br />wliJ.ether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) <br /> <br />Be:cause the proposed project involves the installation of a new parking lot with a capacity of <br />fewer than 1,000 cars, MN Rules 7023.9015, Subp. 4.A exempts the project from the need to <br />obtain an Indirect Source Permit (lSP). <br /> <br />Based on the traffic analysis in Question 22, the increase in the number of average daily trips <br />generated by the proposed project is 5,200. The traffic volumes projected in Question 22 have <br />belen used to estimate carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from the source and CO concentration <br />levels near the most critical intersections in the year 2001, one year after construction of the <br />project. <br /> <br />2362468 \48185-l/l'MN <br /> <br />14 <br />