My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02889
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:23:37 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:27:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2889
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
JAMES ADDITION
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ramsey County belie\es that Falf\le\\ ma\ :leeJ [" l~c' \\ IJc'nc'J In the distant tuture bur <br />has no idea \I,'hen :\.pparent!\ am planning \\ l)ulJ be se\ era! \ears awa\ \\ Ith <br />construction several years after that Homes bordering Falf\ie\\ wil] be further Impacted <br />by any significant increased traftic and an\ hlture roadwav widening Those homeowners <br />need to be treated fairly \,'hat mitigation or aJternatl\es are possible and is it possIble for <br />the County or City to plan for this1 It IS expected to be dIscussed further <br /> <br />Oakcrest and Rose Place Traffic <br />Traffic counts are not known Speeding by neighbors and otht:rs is a concern and occurs <br />because the hills and straight roadway make is easy to go fast The concept of traffic <br />calming changes have been discussed as a way to cause drivers to naturaJly reduce speeds <br />Further discussion is anticipated <br /> <br />3) RECOMME~DA T:O~S O~ LA~D l'SE ZO'lS <br />Charge Should there be a chwge in land use zones in or near the neighborhood. and. If <br />so. why and to what other uses1 <br /> <br />Rehbein/Matheson property at the southeast corner of County Road Ole and Fairview <br />The city has recently purchased this property from Fairview up to and including the cold <br />storage building The owner had the property for sale and there apparently was interest in <br />developing it as commercial with Fairview Avenue frontage The city was proposing to <br />purchase it for seasonal storage and passive public uses and was considering <br />improvements The task force agreed with city plans and that it should be purchased so it <br />could not be developed <br /> <br />Entire Neighborhood <br />The possibility of future commercia!ibusiness development of the entire neighborhood has <br />always been rumored and pondered by the neighborhood It has been reinforced by the <br />previous sale and redevelopment of two portions of this residential neighborhood into the <br />existing southern retail centers However, it appears that an approximate cost of$20 <br />million to purchase the remaining 1 76 homes (43 acres) and the 3 businesses on these 71 <br />acres is likely too much to make commercial redevelopment economically feasible The <br />limited traffic access on Snelling and Fairview may well be a negative for any <br />redevelopment, <br /> <br />Losing the adjoining neighbors and being surrounded by current and redeveloping business <br />fosters the concern about how the remaining neighborhood can continue to remain viable <br />and maintain property values To date the neighborhood infrastructure and moderate <br />value homes have been well maintained and the number of homes sold per year has been <br />average If not redeveloped in total, which most may not want, a clear direction to resolve <br />neighborhood problems and mitigate impacts is needed <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.