My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02926
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:24:13 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2926
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1742 ALTA VISTA DR
Applicant
SKUNDBERG, ROBERT
Status
DENIED
PIN
142923440009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1. Section 1004.020, City Code, requires a minimum lot area of 11,000 square <br />feet, a minimum lot width of 85 feet, and a maximum floor area ratio of 0.3 <br />for interior lots in an R1 zoning district. The existing parcel is 16,585 square <br />feet in area, 71.6 feet in width, and has a floor area ratio of 0.14. <br /> <br />2. The relocation of Dale Street in the late 1960s created numerous through <br />lots in this area. Since then, several lots have been split such as that being <br />proposed by the applicant. The lot directly north of this parcel was split in <br />1983 to create a lot with 7,500 square feet along Alta Vista Drive N and a lot <br />with 9,375 square feet along Dale Street N. <br /> <br />3. The proposed split would create a western lot with a lot area of 6,915 square <br />feet, a lot width of 71.64 feet, and a floor area ratio of 0.34. The split would <br />also create an eastern lot with a lot area of 8,954 square feet, a lot width of <br />71.64 feet, and a maximum floor area of 2,686 square feet (0.3 FAR). The <br />vacant eastern lot would include a 30 foot setback from Dale Street N, 10 <br />foot side yard setbacks, and a 30 foot rear yard setback (building foot print <br />of 65' x 51.64' - 3,356.6 square feet). <br /> <br />4. A utility servicing plan for the new parcel showing the location of the sanitary <br />sewer connection, ten foot sanitary sewer easement across the western <br />parcel, and water connection was not provided by the applicant. <br /> <br />5. Written permission from Ramsey County for a driveway on to Dale Street N <br />from the new parcel (eastern portion of lot) was not provided by the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />6. Written documentation from a soils engineer, including a soil borings report, <br />that the new parcel is suitable for construction, or identifying what remedies <br />are needed to correct the soils, was not provided by the applicant. <br /> <br />7. Without the additional requested information, staff is unable to determine <br />whether the proposed variance from the lot area and width requirements is <br />in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br /> <br />8. The creation of a new parcel that may not be buildable because of utility, <br />soils, and access issues is not in harmony with the general purpose and <br />intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code <br />(Zoning). <br /> <br />9. The creation of a new parcel that may not be buildable because of utility, <br />soils, and access issues will adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare. <br /> <br />RCA (PF2926) - 09/22/97 - Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.