Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BRIGGS A....D MORGAN <br /> <br />3. Abatement Resolution: Development Agreement. After the <br />public hearing, the jurisdiction can adopt the "abatement resolution," which <br />must specify the terms of the abatement and include a specific statement on <br />the nature and extent of the public benefits which are expected to result from <br />it. The abatement can be limited any way the jurisdiction might choose, e.g., <br />for a term less than 10 years, to a specific dollar amount or to taxes resulting <br />from specitic improvements. Again, land values, TIF, fiscal disparities and <br />50% of the school's general education levy cannot be abated. The maximum <br />term of an abatement is 10 years, but if the abatement resolution does not <br />specify a term, the abatement is for 8 years. Unless the abatement resolution <br />provides that the abatement can't be modified, the law specifically gives the <br />jurisdiction the right to review and modify the abatement every second year <br />after approval. For an abatement project lasting more than two years, <br />therefore, it would be important to include in the abatement resolution a <br />statement that the abatement can't be modified; otherwise, the governing body <br />would have the discretion to change or discontinue it every two years. <br /> <br />The abatement resolution does not as a rule dispense with the need for <br />a development or similar agreement between the jurisdiction and the <br />abatement beneficiary. The jurisdiction will want one to set the terms upon <br />which the abatement will be granted or continue, e.g., what will be built and/or <br />operated and how many jobs. The beneficiary will want a binding contract for <br />its entitlements, which an abatement resolution may not be for certain. <br /> <br />4. School Districts. A school district cannot abate more than 50% <br />of its annual general education levy. Furthermore, a school district must <br />reapprove an abatement each year. Therefore, school districts have the <br />discretion to discontinue the abatement in any or all subsequent years after <br />first approved, even (apparently) where the school's abatement is pledged to <br />pay bonds. Probably the best that can be done to assure the school district's <br />full-term participation is to provide a "moral obligation" along the lines that <br />the district promises to bring the renewal forward for decision every year and <br />an acknowledgement by the district that the beneficiary relies on the district's <br />assistance in going forward, but the district could still terminate the <br />abatement. <br /> <br />369177.1 <br /> <br />4 <br />