My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02963
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02963
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:25:31 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:54:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2963
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
1159 LARPENTEUR AVE W
Applicant
BRADLEY REAL ESTATE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />BRIGGS A...'lD l\-IORGAN <br /> <br />5. TIF Districts. Taxes on a TIF district can't be abated. A close <br />question, however, is whether an abatement agreement could take effect <br />following the expiration of the TIF district. <br /> <br />6. Bondin[!. Bonds may be issued to provide an amount equal to <br />the sum of the abatements granted. The maximum amount of the bonds can't <br />exceed the total of the expected abatements. \Vhile the bonds may be general <br />obligations of the jurisdiction, since their issuance is governed by Minnesota <br />Statutes, Chapter 475, the State Bond Code, those general obligation bonds <br />can generally not be issued without voter referendum. Abatement bonds do <br />not count against the jurisdiction's net debt limit. If bonds are issued the right <br />to review and modify an abatement every two years does not apply but annual <br />school district reauthorization is still required, and may be denied. Two or <br />more of the jurisdictions that have granted abatements for the same property <br />could join together so that one of them issues bonds and the others make a <br />pledge of their respective abatement amounts to the payment of those bonds. <br /> <br />7. Eligible Costs. Unlike direct use of abatement, \vhere there is <br />no particular requirement as to reimbursement of "eligible" or other identified <br />costs, if bonds are issued, their proceeds may be used for public improvements <br />that benefit the property, to acquire and convey land or other property, to <br />reimburse the owner for the cost of improvements made to the property, or <br />to pay the costs of issuing the bonds. <br /> <br />8. Limit on Abatements. Each jurisdiction has an annual limit on <br />the total of all of its abated taxes. The limit is 5% of the jurisdiction's current <br />levy or $100,000, whichever is greater. <br /> <br />9. Compensating Levy: Levy Limits. For each abatement granted, <br />the jurisdiction is required to add to its levy amount for the current year the <br />total estimated amount of all abatements. These additional levies would <br />generally be subject to applicable levy limits, except for "special levies" made <br />for bonded indebtedness, which the Department of Revenue has interpreted <br />to mean primarily general obligation bonding. See the attached letters of <br />Richard Gardner of the Department of Revenue. In simple terms, the <br />abatement comes out of the remainder of the jurisdiction's tax base. <br /> <br />369177.1 <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.